Flavours & fragrances
moke flavourings are used more widely in foods than one might think. In meat, fish and cheese, they have frequently been used as alternatives to traditional smoking processes. They have also been key determinants of the taste of many snack foods, sauces and soups, as well as finding their way into confectionery, drinks and edible ices. Now, their days are numbered. As of January 2025, food producers have had to start looking at replacements for eight commonly used smoke flavourings – proFagus Smoke R714 (SF-001), Zesti Smoke Code 10 (SF-002), Smoke Concentrate 809045 (SF-003), Scansmoke (SF- 004), SmokEz C-10 (SF-005), SmokEz Enviro-23 (SF-006), proFagus Smoke R709 (SF-008) and Fumokomp (SF-009).
S
These products have been available in the EU for ten years, and a renewal for their authorisation had been requested for a further ten years, but a review by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was instigated by the European Commission in order to examine the chemical characterisation, genotoxicity and dietary exposure of each product, and the outcomes in 2023 led to a major rethink. “The Commission’s key priority is the health of its citizens,” a source at the Commission told Ingredients Insight. “A thorough scientific assessment of the safety of what we eat, therefore, lies at the heart of the EU’s food safety rules. As a result of their mandatory renewal process and on the basis of the corresponding EFSA opinions, in April 2024 a large majority of member states supported the Commission’s proposals not to renew the EU authorisations of the eight smoke flavourings currently on the market.”
A hazard to health
Looking back, the ban did not come as a surprise. Back in April 2021, the Commission proposed a ban on the use of certain smoke-flavouring primary products in food and beverages. At the end of 2022, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU reached a political agreement on the revised regulation of smoke flavourings used in or on foods, banning smoke flavouring primary products derived from the pyrolysis of various materials, including wood. Currently, the EU is in a transition period, which will run until July 2026. During this time, the sale of products that were lawfully placed on the market before the ban took effect will be allowed, and they may remain on the market until their best-before or use-by date.
The reason for the ban is that the available scientific evidence does not allow experts to rule out concerns regarding genotoxicity for any of these
Ingredients Insight /
www.ingredients-insight.com
eight smoke flavourings. Genotoxicity is the ability of a chemical to damage the genetic material of cells. In essence, they could pose an increased risk of cancer and certain inherited diseases because of their potential impact on the genome. “For these smoke flavourings assessed by EFSA, genotoxicity concerns are either confirmed or cannot be ruled out,” says our source at the Commission. “Following member states’ endorsement of its proposal which will enhance the protection of the health of EU citizens, the Commission has now adopted the regulation to not renew these eight smoke flavourings. The measures adopted include sufficient time for operators to adapt to this new situation.”
“Our risk assessments help decision-makers to decide whether to include a new smoke flavouring on the EU list, to renew currently authorised smoke flavourings or update how they can be used in different food types,” adds our source at EFSA. “In its 2023 scientific opinions, EFSA could not rule out concerns regarding genotoxicity for any of the eight smoke flavourings assessed. However, the likelihood that harmful effects associated with genotoxicity emerge depends on various factors, including an individual’s genetics and dietary habits.” EFSA has not investigated the chance that such harmful effects would occur as a result of consumption of foods flavoured with smoke flavourings, but it has taken a conservative approach to its assessments, considering worst-case scenarios to estimate hazards and risks. The ban comes at a time when demand for smoked flavours, particularly in meat and cheese and, increasingly, in the plant-based category, is growing. Legislation surrounding the use, labelling and declaration on-pack of smoke flavours has always been quite distinct, so many manufacturers have been reluctant to use ‘real smoke’ for some time, but the ban will certainly have further impact on the formulation of many foods.
“The move has been largely expected and while there was some kickback on the ban from the meat industry, many food manufacturers have been ahead of the game,” says Mike Bagshaw, founder of flavour house International Taste Solutions (ITS). “They have been sourcing alternative ingredients and reformulating recipes to naturally recreate the flavour and aroma of smoke in their products.”
A chance to make a change When popular and useful ingredients are taken off the table, it would seem to follow that certain foods on the market will suffer. Customers and food producers can easily be wedded to certain flavours, and any change can potentially have a seismic
65
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94
