search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
116 HEALTHCARE


JUST OVER A DECADE AGO, I was sitting in a crowded auditorium at a European Healthcare Design conference, listening to a Danish architect describing an exemplary project for ‘later life’ living, paid for by local government, that he had just completed in Copenhagen. You could almost hear – and definitely feel – the collective sigh of envy at the spacious, light- filled apartments with deep windows looking onto individual balconies and lush, landscaped shared gardens, which emanated from myself and the rest of the delegates. At the time the UK’s default options ranged from unlovely nursing homes, or blocks of small, sheltered apartments in cities or towns, or – at the more luxurious end – privately funded, gated communities located miles from anywhere and thus minimising intergenerational connection and support.


Fast forward to 2023, and a very similarly covetous atmosphere was generated among the London architecture media on a first visit to Appleby Blue, an almshouse-inspired scheme by Witherford Watson Mann (WWM), in a densely residential part of Southwark. Tis is not a council-funded scheme, though Southwark Council has gifted the land to the client, United St Saviour’s Charity (UStSC), and helped to broker additional funding through a Section 106 agreement with developer JTRE (which didn’t want to include affordable housing next to its development, 185 Bankside, behind Tate Modern; Southwark was happy for that investment to land here).


Established 500 years ago, UStSC has a


long history of housing communities in need in Southwark, including building the borough’s first almshouse in 1588. What’s more, its head of research and influence, Alison Benzimra, has found convincing evidence, as co-author of the ‘Almshouse Longevity Study’ (Bayes Business School, May 2023), that living in an almshouse can boost residents’ lifespans by as much as two and a half years.


Te almshouse is a particularly relevant design for these times, when loneliness – especially in ageing populations – is said to have a greater negative impact on our life expectancy than obesity, depleting both physical and mental health. Designed around a shared courtyard or garden, and thus creating a safe central circulation space with built-in visibility and sociability, the almshouse promotes a high degree of community interaction. But post pandemic, loneliness and isolation are two of the biggest problems facing society in general. For the ageing in particular, part of that isolation comes from a lack of engagement not just with peers but also with other age groups. Tis is something Appleby


CASE STUDY APPLEBY BLUE


Appleby Blue is an exciting step forward in affordable later living, offering 57 apartments around a central, planted courtyard, with the design and programming all oriented


to maximise engagement within the community but also extending out to the surrounding neighbourhood. Working to an enlightened brief from client United Saint Saviour’s Charity (UStSC), on land donated by Southwark Council, architects Witherford Watson Mann (WWM) have placed key social spaces along the ground floor, one whole length of which fronts onto a busy Southwark high street. There are workshop spaces and a community kitchen adjoining a double-height Garden Room (dining space and lounge space, with open kitchen) offering views and access directly through to the lush courtyard garden, designed by Grant Associates, which also designed the delightful, and productive, roof terrace filled with easily accessed planters.


Integral to the programming is a range of activities and events around intergenerational cooking and


PHILIPP EBELING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157