| 31
Above left: The BWF is a member of the Timber in Construction Working Group Above right: BWF members whose products were included in the MHCLG testing, exceeded the required 30-minute threshold PHOTO: WEST PORT
Instead, U-values will need to be calculated for the specific size and configuration of every product supplied.
This requirement introduces a new administrative and technical challenge, particularly for smaller manufacturers who may lack in-house expertise or software. It also raises questions about certification processes, consistency, and how these values will be validated at scale.
In response, as part of our ongoing public affairs activity, we have raised concerns with the government regarding the difficulty most members will face with having to undertake U-value calculations for every individual window or doorset they supply. This is a key focus for the BWF, and we’ll be offering support to our members as the final detail of the standard is confirmed.
GOVERNMENT BACKS LOW-CARBON FUTURE
In a celebrated move for the timber industry, the UK government has recommitted to the Timber in Construction Roadmap – a strategic plan to boost the safe use of sustainable home-grown, low-carbon timber in housebuilding and infrastructure. The roadmap signals a shift in national
policy, positioning timber as central to hitting net zero targets, improving biodiversity, and supporting rural economies.
As an integral member of the Timber in Construction Working Group, we’re proud to play a part in championing the use of timber throughout the construction supply chain by continuing our ‘Build It Better with Wood’ campaign and working alongside industry stakeholders such as the CITB to ensure that future generations have the skills and knowledge they need to help our profession thrive.
A REGULATORY TURNING POINT The publication of the government’s response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 in March 2025 represents a landmark moment
for the built environment. It includes the acceptance of 49 recommendations in full, and nine in principle, with far-reaching consequences for construction product regulation, fire safety, and building design. Among the most significant changes is the move toward a single regulator for construction products and the strengthening of enforcement powers. There is also a clear push toward greater product traceability, improved testing protocols, and tighter oversight of those placing products on the market. We welcome the proposal that states all products are to feature clear, accessible and accurate product identification, which is a mandate of the BWF Fire Door Alliance. Fire doors manufactured by BWF Fire Door Alliance members are clearly labelled or plugged, providing the critical information to a wide range of users, from construction professionals to everyday consumers. These developments are a positive move to ensure that performance claims are backed by robust, independent evidence. For our members, who are at the forefront of fire door third-party certification, it’s a clear demonstration of the importance of independently verified testing data and rigorous certification programmes. Closely linked to the government’s fire safety reforms is the planned transition from the British Standard (BS 476-22) to the European classification (EN 13501-2) for fire door testing, set to take full effect by September 2029. This change to a single classification system aligns with the recommendations of the Hackitt Report,
which called for greater consistency in building safety regulations.
This however has resulted in questions from those responsible for fire doors throughout the supply chain. To help support BWF members and the broader industry through this transition, the BWF Fire Door Alliance is focused on a proactive education campaign to advise that:
• Fire doors classified under the national system will meet the requirements of the
building regulations for new installations up to September 2029.
• Fire doors already installed in buildings on that date will remain fit-for-purpose
subject to a programme of inspection and maintenance.
As a sector we’re aware of the outstanding performance of timber fire doors based on Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government’s (MHCLG) testing – the results found that timber fire doors performed consistently, passing the 30-minute fire resistance test in both directions. In fact, BWF members whose products were included in the investigation, exceeded the required 30-minute threshold, with fire resistance times averaging 46 minutes. However, it’s vital that we and our partners across the industry work together to help our sector and importantly, our customers, prepare for the upcoming change – and key to this is stressing that at this stage, there is no need to replace fit-for-purpose fire doors. As we head toward the middle of 2025, it is clear that change is not coming, it’s already here.
As we head towards the middle of 2025 it is clear that change is not coming, it’s already here
But alongside changes to industry standards and guidance comes opportunities to demonstrate quality, embrace sustainable growth, and contribute to a safer, lower carbon-built environment. At the BWF we look forward to embracing these changes and supporting our members to ensure the continued growth of our exciting sector. ■
www.ttjonline.com | May/June 2025 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85
