search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
| 15


BEING SEEN TO BE SUSTAINABLE PLUS


The US hardwood sector is providing copper-bottomed proof of its sustainability while encouraging the market to make more sustainable use of its timber, writes TTJ consultant editor Mike Jeffree


US hardwood is demonstrably sustainable. The American hardwood forest has grown dramatically in the last 50 years, with the volume of standing timber increasing from 5 billion m3


to 12 billion m3 .


In fact, such is the rate of growth, a concern today is that the number of trees dying naturally in the forest exceeds the number harvested. That presents potential fi re and forest health risks. So, effectively, we need to be using more timber to underpin forest sustainability. At the same time, the American Hardwood Export Council (AHEC) maintains in its latest market development campaign, we can make more sustainable use still of this resource.


In recent years, AHEC’s message has been that one way of doing that is working more in tune with nature by using the spread of US hardwood species according to their abundance. That simultaneously increases market choice and cuts risk of supply stress on species currently in greatest demand.


AHEC’s new campaign No.1 Common (see pp40-41) explains sustainable use is also about exploiting as much of the tree as possible in the form of long-term carbon storing timber products. That means designers and end- users exploring the performance and aesthetic potential of lower grades rather than opting exclusively for top end timber. To demonstrate what can be achieved with No.1 Common US hardwood, AHEC has challenged three European designers to create furniture using it in a species of their choice. The end result will be displayed in a special exhibition at the 3daysofdesign festival in Copenhagen and will subsequently appear at other events, including in the UK.


The US hardwood sector has also well and truly taken on board the fact that today, to see fi rst-hand with your own eyes that a forest and its timber is sustainable is not enough to satisfy the tide of timber market legality and sustainability regulation rising worldwide – the latest example being the upcoming EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). Consequently, AHEC has been prime mover behind the Sustainable Hardwood Coalition (SHC) (see p45). This has developed a legality and sustainability assurance system tailored specifi cally to the type of low intensity forest management and fragmented forest holding model that prevails in the US, with its more than 9 million forest owners.


It combines third party legality risk assessment against the US Framework for Jurisdictional Risk Assessment (JRA) of Legal Compliance of Hardwood Production, with independent assessment of risk of deforestation using GIS and AI technology.


The latter is based on the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer (CDL), an annual geo-referenced, crop-specifi c land cover data layer produced using satellite imagery and agricultural ground reference data. The SHC system also uses ‘smart geolocation’ to identify county of origin of US hardwood.


That’s the science bit – or at least part of it. There will also soon be a proof of provenance procedure to accompany it, plus a web portal making all the legality, deforestation-free and provenance data publicly available. You surely can’t argue with that making US hardwood production a closed and shut case of sustainability. ■


www.ttjonline.com | May/June 2025 | TTJ


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85