search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
48 | Feature: Wood Awards


SHAPING A LEGACY – HOW AHEC HELPED GROW THE WOOD AWARDS


Starting life as the Carpenters’ Awards in 1971, the Wood Awards today is widely recognised as the UK’s foremost celebration of timber architecture and design, and its evolution has been shaped in no small part by the American Hardwood Export Council (AHEC). Bryony Bodimeade, TDUK editorial and events coordinator, interviewed AHEC’s European Director David Venables.


When David Venables joined AHEC in 1995, the organisation’s UK director at the time, Michael Buckley, was already supporting the Carpenters’ Awards, both financially and through a strong relationship with Awards’ founder, Terence Mallinson. In AHEC’s office – which was then based in Throgmorton Avenue, within the Carpenters’ Company grounds – David encountered an awards programme recognising the skill and artistry of UK joiners and carpenters rooted in craft and tradition. “I remember seeing some really interesting work being entered,” he recalls. “There was a huge depth of skill, representing a lot of potential in the UK wood industry. But the Awards were looking inward rather than outward.” AHEC, meanwhile, was beginning to expand its outreach – speaking to architects, engaging with the press, and building awareness around American hardwoods. The organisation understood that architects held the key to unlocking greater possibilities for wood in contemporary design. “We realised the power of architects,” David says. “We knew if we could highlight strong case studies in wood, the press would follow. There was an opportunity to broaden the conversation.”


BECOMING A NATIONAL PLATFORM This shift in thinking laid the groundwork for the evolution of the Wood Awards to which the Carpenters’ Awards rebranded in 2000. This signalled a shift in ambition. Around the same time, Swedish Wood (then led by Charles Trevor) was running a major timber campaign in the UK. Sensing the opportunity, David brought together Swedish Wood, the Carpenters’ Company, and Michael Buckley (then working as a timber industry consultant) to dramatically strengthen the programme. Together, they envisioned a competition with professional project management, judge visits to shortlisted buildings, a formal ceremony, and wider industry and media engagement. “The sponsorship of AHEC, Swedish Wood and the Carpenters’ Company got the reimagined


TTJ | Spring 2026 | www.ttjonline.com Above: AHEC’s European Director David Venables


Wood Awards off the ground,” David reflects. “Together with Michael’s visionary ideas, it was a leap in ambition.”


Michael Buckley’s influence, he says, cannot be overstated. “He had a real vision. He understood the need for powerful judges and the importance of reframing the Awards: not just celebrating craft but pushing what’s possible with wood. It was about recognising projects where architects and designers really understood the material.”


This philosophical shift toward design leadership, innovation and meaningful material expression became the defining character of the modern Wood Awards. Another significant step in the early 2000s was the decision to enlist architects as judges. One of the first was Jim Greaves of Hopkins Architects, who joined after his project, the US White Oak–rich Haberdashers’ Hall, received a Highly Commended in 2003. “Bringing in Jim was transformational,” David says. “Now we had an architect who could really talk wood.” Another long-standing judge, Andrew


Lawrence, was at the time ‘the’ timber specialist at Arup – years before the firm established its own timber department. “It’s hard to look back from where we are now,” David notes, “when attitudes towards wood are so positive. Back then, only a handful of people were interested.” As more leading practitioners engaged, the Awards became an essential platform demonstrating that the UK had a robust, innovative timber industry ready to support ambitious design. Over time, organisations such as TRADA supported administration and judging, and early financial backing also came from the Ghanaian and Malaysian Timber Councils. The Awards was evolving into a central institution of the UK timber sector, one that helped bring the industry together. “I’m really happy that the Wood Awards sits there as a jewel in the industry’s communication crown,” David says. “It became a vehicle for recognition. And now, with the spread of social media, winners become ambassadors for timber.” Across 25 years of continuous delivery – achieved “through collaboration and passion,” as David puts it – the Awards have also wrestled productively with the balance between craftsmanship and design innovation. “A brilliantly designed building without craft won’t be at the top of its game,” he explains. “Similarly, exquisite making without strong design doesn’t do justice to the material’s potential.”


This interplay came into focus with the Downland Gridshell, winner of the first-ever Gold Award in 2003. “It absolutely should have won the RIBA Stirling Prize,” David recalls. The Awards increasingly became a showcase for projects using every form of timber, from CLT and plywood to beams, hardwoods and finely crafted furniture. A recent example is the Black & White Building, the 2023 Commercial and Sustainability Winner, and the first project to use thermally modified US


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69