search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Customer Traits • Section 5


As seen in Chart 5.6, approximately 55 percent of the rent- ers surveyed for the 2019 Demand Study reported that they owned their home. Around 42.3 percent reported that they are renters. Nearly three percent reported that they neither own nor rent their home. This may very well represent rent- ers, such as millennials, living with their parents or seniors who are living with their children or other relatives.


It is interesting to note that these numbers are remarkably


similar to those reported in the 2017 study, where 54 percent of renters lived in a single-family home and 41 percent lived in an apartment or condominium. In 2017, five percent of self- storage renters cited their residence as “other”—nearly twice as many as in this newest study.


As seen in Chart 5.7 on page 50, the majority of self-


storage renters (51.2 percent) are in suburban areas, 36.4 per- cent reside in urban areas, and 12.3 percent are located in rural market areas. Chart 5.8 on page 50 presents the same data by region. Clearly, the South has the most self-storage renters (41.5 percent). The second highest concentration of renters is in the West at 25.3 percent.


For the Midwest and Northeast Regions, it is a quite dif-


ferent picture. The Midwest has 18 percent of the self-storage renter pool while the Northeast sees 15.2 percent of the in- dustry renters. The difference between these two regions and the West and South may be due to the fact that homes in these areas tend to have basements and attics. Communities there may also be less restrictive.


Table 5.2 lists the top 10 states with the most HOAs. As


shown, with the exception of Illinois, New York, and Massa- chusetts, all states are in the South or the West. HOAs tend to have restrictions on parking, which leaves no room in ga- rages to store excess items. Moreover, restrictions are even more strict for the parking of boats and RVs.


It is no surprise


that the majority of self-storage rent- ers (46 percent) are employed full time, as seen in Table 5.3. The next


largest


segment of rent- ers (19.9 percent) is made up of retirees, while 10.7 percent are not employed outside the home. Supporting the tenant mix data, military and student renters make up the smallest percent- age of renters on a nationwide basis. Remember: Self- storage is all about location. While one facility may have only a few military renters, a facility 10 miles away could have


considerably


more. Knowing the





 Florida


California Texas Illinois


North Carolina New York


Massachussetts Georgia


Washington State Arizona


48,250 48,150 20,050 18,700 14,000 13,875 11,000 10,700 10,450 9,625


Source: Community Associations Institute





 Full Time


Part Time Military


Self Employed / Business Owner


Not employed outside of home


46.0% 7.6% 3.4%


8.0%


Student 4.4% Retired 19.9%


10.7% Source: SSA 2019 Self Storage Demand Study


household income of the surrounding market area can aid a facility manager in setting rental rates. As seen in Table 5.4 on page 50, the ma- jority of renters surveyed for the SSA Demand Study have a household income of $125,000 per year or more. The next highest income for renters is between $75,000 and $100,000 (12.6 percent). Surprisingly, the next highest percentage of


2021 Self-Storage Almanac


49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152