search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Economics & Demographics • Section 2 Millennial population growth in 2012-2013 in big, dense cities was outpaced


by big-city suburbs and lower-density cities. At the metro level, Colorado Springs, San Antonio, and Peabody (in the Boston area) experienced the fastest growth in the millennial population. Nine of the 10 metros with the fastest mil- lennial population growth were in the South and West. Boomer population growth during 2012-2013 was also highest in big-city


suburbs and lower-density cities, but only slightly ahead of the growth in big, dense cities. Overall, boomer population growth skewed more urban than mil- lennial growth did. These new Census data show, therefore, that millennials are not driving urban growth while boomers are urbanizing to some extent. All of the metros with the fastest growing boomer population were in the South and West, with Texas and the Carolinas dominating the list.


Hispanic Population Growth After decades of heavy immigration from Latin America, the Hispanic popula- tion in America has grown to the point where U.S. births are now the main driver of its growth. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, immigration was the main source of


growth of the Hispanic population. But according to a report from the Pew Re- search Center, the size of the Hispanic population in the U.S., now at 53 million, is large enough that U.S. births of Hispanic children will continue outpacing immigration flows.


As the Sun Belt and areas of the Western U.S. experience high migration rates and increasing diversity,


it behooves self-storage owners—both east and west of the Mississippi—to ensure their facilities are prepared for the changing face of America.


With 800,000 U.S.-born Hispanics turning 18 each year, researchers say the


population will continue increasing its share of the American population and its influence on American institutions. The report also found that Hispanics continue to be the fastest growing group in the country. Hispanics increased from 12.5 percent of the population in 2000 to 16.9 percent in 2012.


Top Growth States The U-Haul National Migration Trend Report for 2013, reflecting the nation’s top growth states for families that moved during the year, shows that Florida had the highest percentage of growth for states with more than 20,000 fami- lies moving. Florida recorded 4.85 percent more families moving into the state than out. Texas and Washington also showed substantial growth increases. For states with 5,000 to 20,000 families moving, Vermont had the highest


percentage for the second year in a row, with a growth rate of 8.12 percent in 2013. Maine and Delaware took second and third place respectively. Growth was determined by calculating the percentage of inbound moves vs. outbound moves for each state. The U-Haul report indicates that for cities with more than 5,000 families


moving, Dallas took the number 1 spot with the highest percentage of growth, at 9.96 percent. Henderson, Nev., took the number 2 spot with a 9.58 percent- age of growth, and Pittsburgh was third with 6.92 percent. In terms of destination cities, U-Haul reported that Houston took the num- ber 1 spot again in 2013—the fifth year in a row. For the fourth year in a row,


Table 2.7 – Top 10 U.S. Growth Cities With More Than 5,000 Families Moving (January - December 2013)


Rank State 1 Dallas


2 Henderson, Nev. 3 Pittsburgh 4 Austin, Texas 5


Jersey City, N.J. 6 Seattle


7 Louisville, Ky. 8 Denver


9 San Francisco 10 Victorville, Calif. 11


Columbus, Ohio


12 Washington, D.C. 13 Ontario, Calif. 14 Los Angeles 15 Indianapolis 16 Madison, Wis. 17 Reno, Nev.


18 Vancouver, Wash. 19 Spokane, Wash. 20 Sacramento, Calif. 21 Corpus Christi, Tex. 22 Portland, Ore. 23 Brooklyn, N.Y. 24 Nashville, Tenn. 25 Jacksonville, Fla.


Source: U-Haul International 2015 Self-Storage Almanac 45


Percentage Growth 9.96%


9.58% 6.92% 6.69% 5.87% 4.89% 3.74% 3.73% 3.53% 3.31% 3.19% 2.95% 2.79% 2.46% 2.42% 2.16% 1.95% 1.44% 0.94% 0.77% 0.61% 0.53% 0.40% 0.13% 0.06%


Orlando, Fla., took the number 2 spot while Las Vegas, Chicago, and San Antonio followed. As the Sun Belt and areas of the Western U.S.


experience high migration rates and increasing diversity, it behooves self-storage owners—both east and west of the Mississippi—to ensure their facilities are prepared for the changing face of America.


Table 2.6 – Top 10 U.S. Growth States With 5,000 - 20,000 Families Moving (January - December 2013)


Rank State


1 Vermont 2 Maine


3 Delaware 4 Alaska


5 New Mexico 6


7 Idaho


8 West Virginia 9 Mississippi 10 North Dakota


Source: U-Haul International District of Columbia


Percentage Growth 8.12%


6.66% 5.92% 4.44% 3.17% 2.78% 2.75% 2.49% 0.57% 0.36%


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132