search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Industry Profile • Section 1


new self-storage facility in just about any of the top metro markets in the U.S. and find one of the REITs or larger com- panies that will successfully manage it—or purchase it out- right. In fact, there are facilities currently being built that are under contract to be purchased by a larger operator at a specified cap rate upon completion and certificate of occupancy. On the contrary, developers need to proceed with caution beyond the top 50 markets, especially where professional management is concerned, since the top op- erators tend to focus only on those larger metro areas.


Unfortunately, while there is plenty of money chasing deals, there is


also a shortage of quality properties available for acquisition.


Bloomberg is not the only organization that is taking


notice of the self-storage sector’s excellent performance and strong returns; institutional investors have also started to track and invest in the industry. Institutional investors, the biggest players in the investment landscape, pool indi- viduals’ money to purchase equities, securities, real estate, and other investments. They are the retirement funds, pen- sion plans, insurance companies, hedge funds, commercial trusts, and endowment funds that seem to have limitless supplies of capital. This attention by institutional investors has led to an


influx of money for the self-storage industry. According to Marc Boorstein, Principal at Chicago-based MJ Partners Real Estate Services, new well-capitalized groups are com- ing to the industry every month wanting to look at self- storage. Why? The returns have been good and there is no sign of a slowdown. Moreover, many institutional investors can utilize their management prowess to make self-storage work as an investment. Unfortunately, while there is plenty of money chasing


deals, there is also a shortage of quality properties avail- able for acquisition. Whereas the number of private equity groups funding private operators is equal to or higher now than those that the industry saw in 2005 and 2006, the cur- rent low supply of inventory and oversupply of capital has made it increasingly difficult for even the REITs and institu- tional investors to close on deals.


Looking At The Numbers The total number of facilities in the U.S. stands at ap- proximately 51,476 with a disproportionately aggressive amount of the growth in the states of Illinois, New York, Florida, California and Texas. It is important to note that un- like the 2014 Almanac, that number denotes a total facility count that includes both primary and secondary facilities. The return to an overall count in the Almanac allows for a


better breakdown of facility growth and related data, including rent- able square footage. Another reason for looking at the industry total as a whole is the


fact that the trend since 2000 has been to build larger facilities. For the 2015 Almanac, we have been able to better refine our data with this trend in mind, thereby equating to an increase in the overall average square footage per facility, which currently stands at an in- dustry total of approximately 2,632,997,400. This shift is addressed in Section 11. Given the acquisitions appetite of the REITs and the institutional


investors, it comes as no surprise that there were significant changes in the 2014 Top Operators’ List compiled by Mini-Storage Messenger magazine (November 2014, page 39). While all of the major operators among the top 10 added inventory


over the past 12 months, it is interesting to see institutional investor W.P. Carey join the list for the first time in the number 10 spot with 157 facilities and more than 9.5 million rentable square feet of stor- age. Listed in the 20th spot in 2012 and moving up to the 13th position in 2013, the William Warren Group is now the 12th largest operator in the U.S. Seeing significant growth this year were long-time top op- erators such as Devon Self Storage, Advantage Storage, and Argus


Table 1.3 – Industry Profile National Data Total Number of Facilities


Average Number of Units per Facility Average Facility Net Square Footage Total Number of Units


Total Rentable Square Footage Average Rentable Square Footage per Person


State Information State with Most Facilities State with Fewest Facilities


State with Most Rentable Square Footage per Person State with Least Rentable Square Footage per Person


MSA Information* Metro Area with Most Facilities


Metro Area with Most Rentable Sq. Footage per Person Market Share**


Largest Self-Storage Company By Number of Facilities


By Rentable Square Footage


Market Share of Top 10 Companies By Number of Facilities


By Rentable Square Footage


Market Share of Top 50 Companies By Number of Facilities


By Rentable Square Footage


Market Share of Top 100 Companies By Number of Facilities


By Rentable Square Footage


* Various MSA have been modified by the US Census Bureau ** Includes international facilities owned by the industry's top operators # Information Not Available


2014


51,475 479


51,150


24.61 million 2.63 billion 8.32


Texas - 6,620


North Dakota - 99 Texas


North Dakota


Dallas, Ft. Worth, Arlington, TX Wichita, KS


Public Storage 4.70 5.80


13.10 16.00


17.10 20.80


18.50 22.50


Source: MiniCo Publishing 2015 Self-Storage Almanac 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132