PFEW CASE WIN


of a 12-year-old girl. The work entailed investigating, reviewing and categorising child abuse images. These types of images, acknowledged by the court as ‘the most horrific’, are well known to affect harm beyond the victims they exploit. Indeed, the judge described “child abuse imagery, ‘as akin to asbestos to the mind, once ingested’ these unthinkable images cannot be unseen.” John was responsible for


examining digital devices saturated in child abuse images, often having to repeatedly watch harrowing, distressing videos of children being abused as he worked towards identifying all the offences in the videos, a critical task for the CPS when considering charges and chances of a successful prosecution. This work often formed the majority of his working week as he spent up to 32 hours a week looking at these images and videos. It is no wonder that John sees this case as the beginning of his battle with PTSD. John describes, “a real lack of training at the sergeant’s level, not realising that the kind of stuff I was asked to deal with has a real impact, on your life and your mental health. I wish that they understood that mental health care is the most important thing when it comes to this type of work.” As the court discovered, the distress and trauma that so affected John, altered his ability to recall events with clarity and precision. Two eminent psychiatrists testified to the fact that continued exposure to images such as those trawled through by John, is capable “of causing psychiatric harm.” John says that in 2016 at a family


gathering, the sudden and unexpected flood of grief and distress released at a family event with young children present was such a traumatic and unexpected reaction he realised he was deeply affected by his work and has struggled to be around children since. However, in 2017/18 John was asked to take over the case work of an officer who


and the skills he needed to process his work and prevent such manifestations of trauma. The judge in the case commented that


“PFEW listened to me when my superiors, my DI and DCI did not acknowledge my concerns; really, they closed ranks and just said, ‘get on with it’.”


had become so distressed by the content of this particular case she was unable to continue. John was left to manage the case pending a restructure.


It is evident that between 2014 and 2018 John was continually exposed to such a level of distressing and traumatic imagery that he felt the impact beyond his professional life; the trauma he was bearing witness to had begun to seep into his personal life. It was almost a last resort for John to ask


PFEW for support; his only regret is not doing it sooner. He says, “When PFEW got involved everything just stopped. It was like I was surrounded by support, PFEW were basically saying, ‘you’re not going to do this to this person’, and that’s exactly what happened. I would say to any officers out there, don’t suffer in silence, ask for support because it is there.” It was also clear, too, in John’s mind that


had the correct procedures been followed from the outset, he may have had the help


John, was “compelling and [had all] the hallmarks of a genuine witness.” In its defence, the force provided a number of witnesses to testify in support of the processes followed, but none could provide any information, statement or supporting documents that detailed the force’s actual risk assessment procedures. This was an absence of knowledge and procedure, and a “striking failure” of the part of the force, as


commented by Judge Smith. As had been clear to Slater and Gordon from the outset, the judge was only really left with one possible conclusion: the member: “should have been screened in 2015 and again in 2017. Had those steps occurred, there would have been an opportunity which would have identified measures to mitigate the stress, trauma and harm caused to him.” Judge Smith went on to identify that this failure to provide the required support was a clear “breach of duty”. The claimant received minimal support despite being “exposed to prolonged exposure to imagery… capable of causing psychiatric harm.” John is at pains to stress that he loved his


job and those around him. He feels that the treatment he received is a reflection of the lack of funds and investment in the police over the past 12 years. Were sufficient training protocols known about, practiced and reinforced, the outcome of John’s experience may have been very different.


23 | POLICE | FEBRUARY 2023


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56