search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
What is worse is that even the version published in 2020 still includes the restriction that certain factors can only be applied to ships up to 300 metres. One has to ask the question: How many years after the launch of the first 400m container ship in 2006 do we have to wait until regulations are adapted to these circumstances?


In order to solve a problem, it is important to not treat the symptoms but rather to determine and address the root cause.


Traceability measures


Accordingly, calls for “transponders” will not solve the problem. Apart from various technical difficulties and high costs, such transponders do not reduce the number of incidents. In fact, the traceability of containers can be expected to lead to additional costs, which have not yet been recognised and taken into account in the many discussions on this issue.


Any container that does not go overboard equally reduces the environmental problems for the coastal states and ultimately for all of humanity, and at the same time any loss that does not occur reduces the costs for the insurance industry and thus ultimately also for the total number of insured parties.


The unconditional cost-saving principle for shipments could be countered effectively by the port states, especially the few northern European port states as part of an association. Those involved/ affected should not hope for international efforts.


A comparison with tanker accidents shows quite clearly: international efforts barely brought about any improvements. However, when the USA, as one of the largest oil importers, made shipbuilding changes a mandatory condition as a port state, the international tanker fleet adapted very quickly.


If one could imagine that only France, the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany imposed regulations regarding certain equipment as a condition for ships to dock, then these four states alone with the main import ports (Le Havre, Rotterdam, Antwerp, Bremerhaven and Hamburg) would generate such high economic pressure via northern European consumers that rapid changes are at least conceivable. If the main southern European ports of Greece, Italy and Spain were to be integrated, almost the entire European market could become unavoidable as a market power for the world’s merchant fleets.


About the Battermann + Tillery Group


With 21 offices all over Germany and various subsidiaries abroad, the Battermann + Tillery Group is one of the largest companies of marine and cargo surveyors in Europe.


For more than 100 years, the group has been providing surveying services for global insurance markets and the transport industry, maintaining the tradition of independent surveyors.


The company’s core


operations lie in documenting and evaluating transport- related cargo damage, technical losses as well as in loss prevention. In its fourth generation, the family business continues to develop and boasts a record of steady growth over the past decades. The team of experts, mostly engineers from the fields of transportation, mechanical engineering and nautical science, provide a unique in- house pool of knowledge.


60 | The Report • June 2021 • Issue 96


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136