search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The court found:


• the relationship between the parties was "sufficiently proximate" as to create a duty of care. It was reasonable for them to have known that the information they had given would likely have been relied upon for entering into a contract of some sort. That would give rise, the court said, to a "special relationship", in which the defendant would have to take sufficient care in giving advice to avoid negligence liability. The relationship was that the plaintiff trusted the defendant with the information and therefore the defendant ought to have been honest.


• however, on the facts, the disclaimer was sufficient to discharge any duty created by Heller's actions. Therefore, there was no order for damages.


This case led the way on the development of Professional Indemnity insurance; in the USA it is more commonly known as Errors and Omissions (E&O) insurance. Insurance was a much needed solution to what had become a growing problem.


The insurance was developed to provide cover for insureds’ losses arising from their oral or written negligent misstatement. However, as time has gone by


the cover provided under these policies has expanded with changes in liability of firms and individuals to include covers such as:


• Libel and slander • Cyber liability • Data protection • Unintentional breaches of copyright


• Loss of documents or data


A common mistake is passing on confidential client data by accidentally copying the wrong person into an email! Or perhaps a one-off comment about a third party at a function that affects their income!


Please bear in mind that Professional Indemnity insurance does not cover you for your losses arising from your loss of reputation because of your negligent misstatement; your financial loss could be greater than that of your clients!


The Professional Indemnity insurance market in the UK has changed dramatically especially over the last ten years. We initially saw significant rate-cutting and an oversaturated market by insurers, but the last few years have witnessed a mass exit of insurers from the underwriting of professional indemnity risks. Consequently, combined with the insurance market losses, the cost of insurance is rising significantly and insurers are no longer as flexible, or willing to underwrite certain risks as they used to be.


So insurers that have remained in the Professional Indemnity insurance market have taken measures to limit their exposures and reduce the risks of paying out costly claim settlements. These measures include:


• Requesting additional information before renewal terms are provided, particularly information regarding business operations, supply chains and how insureds manage risk.


• Charging increased premiums: Insurers lost a lot of their profits from claims arising from recent tragedies, disasters and other professional negligence exposures. Because of this, they have had to increase the premium rates to ensure that adequate cover can be provided.


• Applying cover restrictions: Insurers are imposing more restrictions on policies such as limiting cover to a single aggregate amount, imposing a higher excess, excluding consequential or economic losses and removing some extensions, such as cyber cover.


Even though these are challenging times for those that need Professional Indemnity insurance there is always a glimmer of hope as insurance premiums and restrictions on covers have always shown to be cyclic.


Matrix Insurance Services Ltd - Provider of professional indemnity scheme for IIMS members


Karen Brain


Matrix Insurance Services Ltd. and the author of this article do not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in this article. The information contained in this article is for general use only and is not intended to constitute legal or insurance advice and should not be treated as a substitute for such advice.


Managing Director – solicitor non-practising


Tel: 01892 724060 enquiries@matrix-ins.co.uk


128 | The Report • June 2021 • Issue 96


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136