A draft report prepared by the consultant was reviewed by the Scientific Groups in May 2018. The main objective of the review was to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the end-of-life management of fibre-reinforced plastic (e.g. fibreglass) vessels, and on alternatives to disposal at sea and therefore provide the LC/ LP governing bodies with a better understanding of the scale of the issue, the options for disposal and recycling, and the potential impacts of fibreglass in the marine environment enabling them to determine if any further guidance needed to be developed.
It should be noted that the purpose of the report is to inform discussions on the end of life management of fibre-reinforced plastic (e.g. fibreglass) vessels within the LC/LP. It does not claim to be a complete review of all aspects related to this issue, but will hopefully raise awareness and stimulate further discussions on this issue, both in relation to the LC/LP and within the wider global community.
Acknowledgements
This study was made possible through the funding from the GPML, administered by UN Environment. The Office of the London Convention/Protocol and Ocean Affairs would like to thank the consultant, Dr. Simon Bray (AQASS Ltd) for his work in compiling this report. Thanks are also due to the delegations from LC/ LP Contracting Parties and observers that contributed information to the study and provided a review of the draft report
The report’s Executive Summary reads as follows:
Fibre reinforced plastic (FRP) was created in the 1930s and generally commercially available for boat production from the
60 | The Report • December 2020 • Issue 94
1950s. FRP vessels were given a life expectancy of 30-50 years, whilst in practice many older boats are still in service. This has resulted in a growing number of end-of-life vessels which, whilst no longer financially viable, have substantially intact hulls with limited options for their disposal bar landfill. It is evident that the difficulty of FRP boat disposal has been considered since the 1980s. Attention from industry, research and policy has increased with interest in potentially making boat owners and/or manufacturers financially responsible for end-of- life management of FRP boats.
The issue of end-of-life management of FRP vessels was raised by parties to the London Convention and London Protocol, specifically small island developing states (SIDS). This resulted in the International Maritime
Organization (IMO) commissioning this study to review and summarise currently recognised options for the disposal and recycling of end-of-life FRP boats and to identify where guidance and further work may be required. Whilst the situation of disposal of end-of-life FRP boats was considered in general terms, this study was particularly focused on the practice of at sea disposal and the magnitude of the situation as affecting management in SIDS.
Review of available literature shows that numerous bodies (user groups, Government, industry) have undertaken studies to consider disposal options, with the impetus of finding a sustainable solution for FRP hull disposal. However, most reports and papers conclude that there is not
            
Page 1  |  
Page 2  |  
Page 3  |  
Page 4  |  
Page 5  |  
Page 6  |  
Page 7  |  
Page 8  |  
Page 9  |  
Page 10  |  
Page 11  |  
Page 12  |  
Page 13  |  
Page 14  |  
Page 15  |  
Page 16  |  
Page 17  |  
Page 18  |  
Page 19  |  
Page 20  |  
Page 21  |  
Page 22  |  
Page 23  |  
Page 24  |  
Page 25  |  
Page 26  |  
Page 27  |  
Page 28  |  
Page 29  |  
Page 30  |  
Page 31  |  
Page 32  |  
Page 33  |  
Page 34  |  
Page 35  |  
Page 36  |  
Page 37  |  
Page 38  |  
Page 39  |  
Page 40  |  
Page 41  |  
Page 42  |  
Page 43  |  
Page 44  |  
Page 45  |  
Page 46  |  
Page 47  |  
Page 48  |  
Page 49  |  
Page 50  |  
Page 51  |  
Page 52  |  
Page 53  |  
Page 54  |  
Page 55  |  
Page 56  |  
Page 57  |  
Page 58  |  
Page 59  |  
Page 60  |  
Page 61  |  
Page 62  |  
Page 63  |  
Page 64  |  
Page 65  |  
Page 66  |  
Page 67  |  
Page 68  |  
Page 69  |  
Page 70  |  
Page 71  |  
Page 72  |  
Page 73  |  
Page 74  |  
Page 75  |  
Page 76  |  
Page 77  |  
Page 78  |  
Page 79  |  
Page 80  |  
Page 81  |  
Page 82  |  
Page 83  |  
Page 84  |  
Page 85  |  
Page 86  |  
Page 87  |  
Page 88  |  
Page 89  |  
Page 90  |  
Page 91  |  
Page 92  |  
Page 93  |  
Page 94  |  
Page 95  |  
Page 96  |  
Page 97  |  
Page 98  |  
Page 99  |  
Page 100  |  
Page 101  |  
Page 102  |  
Page 103  |  
Page 104  |  
Page 105  |  
Page 106  |  
Page 107  |  
Page 108  |  
Page 109  |  
Page 110  |  
Page 111  |  
Page 112  |  
Page 113  |  
Page 114  |  
Page 115  |  
Page 116