At the inlet, where the uncleaned gas meets the wash water, there is a mix of wet and dry conditions, with condensing acids from gas and chloride-rich wash water and elevated temperatures. These conditions are very aggressive with a risk of uniform and pitting corrosion.
Within the scrubber body there is a slightly acidic wash water combined with a lower temperature than the inlet. The main risk here is pitting corrosion. Similar conditions apply for other parts of the scrubber system, such as packing material, demisters, tubing and spray nozzles
Crevice corrosion may occur in areas where two surfaces are in close contact, such as flanges, packing material and under deposits.
THE INFLUENCE OF SCRUBBER TYPE ON MATERIAL SELECTION
In the open-loop design, the presence of chlorides typically requires the use of high-alloyed materials. In the closed-loop design, where water is recirculated and treated with caustic chemicals, the corrosivity depends on the quality of the wash water. Typically, the conditions are less aggressive than in the open-loop design.
Since the hybrid design alternates between open- and closed-loop operation, materials must be selected according to the most aggressive operating conditions. Therefore, the same materials are used as in an open-loop scrubber.
OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND FIELD TESTING ARE VITAL
Outokumpu has been supplying stainless steel for marine EGCs since 2006. It carries out extensive R&D activities including laboratory testing and long-term field testing in cooperation with marine scrubber OEMs and their customers. The results show that material selection must always be done on a case by case basis.
For the scrubber body, Ultra 254 SMO is one of the most widely used grades. This is a 6% molybdenum and nitrogen-alloyed austenitic stainless steel with extremely high resistance to both uniform and localized corrosion. It was developed initially for oil and gas offshore platforms and the pulp and paper industry.
However, in some cases it is possible to use a 25Cr super duplex stainless steel such as Forta SDX 2507. This offers similar corrosion resistance to Ultra 254 SMO and improved mechanical strength. It is well proven in extremely corrosive environments such as desalination, chemical, or offshore subsea applications.
Standard 22Cr duplex stainless steel can also be used successfully in less aggressive applications such as closed-loop designs and some parts of open-loop scrubbers. A typical example is Forta DX 2205, which is the most popular duplex product on the market. It offers very good resistance to uniform and localized corrosion in combination with high mechanical strength.
ULTRA 654 SMO – AN ALTERNATIVE FOR SCRUBBER INLETS
As the entry point for hot exhaust gas, the scrubber inlet is a particularly demanding application. Traditionally, Alloy 31 has been the material of choice. It is an iron- nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy with nitrogen addition developed to fill the gap between special alloyed austenitic stainless steels and nickel alloys.
102 | The Report • December 2020 • Issue 94
The test program has established that Ultra 654 SMO offers a viable and more cost-effective alternative. This is a 7% molybdenum and very high nitrogen-alloyed austenitic grade that is the most corrosion resistant stainless steel in the world.
Ultra 654 SMO has a higher mechanical strength than Alloy 31. If the design of the inlet enables this higher strength to be utilized then it could offer weight savings between 15 to 25%. Furthermore, the lower nickel content of Ultra 654 SMO also makes it cost-effective and more stable in price.
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES
Outokumpu currently supplies stainless steel material for use in the construction of around 60% of the marine scrubbers installed every year. Two typical examples include:
Ecospray Technologies S.r.l. Italy (Figure 2) needed a highly corrosion resistant material for its exhaust gas cleaning scrubbers. Ultra 254 SMO proved to be the best combination of performance, price and dimensions.
Figure 2: Ecospray Technologies scrubber in Ultra 254 SMO.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116
