search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Rigorous Requirements


SMS requirements are manyfold and demanding. Constant attention to them is, therefore, necessary to maintaining full compliance. Any identifiable deviation from the SMS requirements that poses a serious threat to safety or risk to the environment requires immediate corrective action.


Such deviations can be easily overlooked. For example, a faulty fire alarm system, problems with the oil and water separator system, or an insufficient number of life rafts are potential safety threats that need to be addressed, reported, and documented. The validity of the documents is another challenge since any changes to the status quo require the documentation to be amended and updated accordingly. Such changes can include any number of things, including for instance, a ship’s change of flag, amended safety precautions for different cargoes, or a change from standard lifeboats to free fall lifeboats.


The main challenge is the pure volume of documentation demanded. All procedures need to be properly recorded and the documentation must be readily available to all relevant stakeholders. In times of heavy workload or difficulties in maintaining schedules, it is easy for errors or omissions in the reporting process to occur.


Challenging Audits


Audits, both internal and external, are taken to check on possible SMS deficiencies and non-conformities. They also measure whether vessel SMS’ comply with ISM Code requirements. There is, however, no guidance as to how to carry out an internal audit, nor what it should include. The guidelines are focused almost entirely on the necessary procedures and documentation.


Internal audits are carried out at least once a year, the main objectives being to verify compliance with the regulations, to ensure that the SMS is being properly implemented, and to supervise actions taken to improve


safety performance. The audit is headed by a designated shore- based person who issues a report on the findings. The company and the vessel personnel are required to act on the report, with both corrective and preventive actions taken. All such actions must be accurately documented.


A comprehensive SMS system also requires that shoreside teams have a high level of oversight of onboard activities. This, in turn, necessitates the constant exchange of documents between ship and shore, which can present a challenge, especially when vessels do not have consistent internet access.


The most common reasons for non-compliance relate to manual documentation issues. Too often, negligence in following the latest requirements results in outdated procedures, checklists or work permits being used. Forms and checklists are sometimes improperly completed, and signatures can be missing. Incident reporting is not always properly processed, and records are sometimes unable to be produced for the auditor.


Approximately half of the audit protocol relates to documentation, and the majority of non-compliance observations are due to incorrect manual completion and handling of documents. Digital systems virtually eliminate this from happening and serve to speed the entire process.


A similar situation exists with ship surveys, which although mainly concerned with the technical condition of the vessel, also require that all documentation is in order. A digitalised handling mechanism eliminates the likelihood of documenting mistakes being made.


The amount of documentation needed is likely to increase along with the growth in regulations. Environmental regulations in particular have grown considerably in recent years, and this growth is expected to continue as the IMO works towards 2030 and 2050 targets. This will add to the workload in accurately completing all required documents, and with that, will also increase the potential for human error to occur.


A Digital Way Forward


Manual documentation and handling of paperwork continues to be the standard and most common method for dealing with SMS requirements, despite the fact that digital technology is available to simplify and improve the efficiency of this task.


68 | The Report • September 2022 • Issue 101


As more and more ‘official’ documents, such as class and statutory certificates and some flag registry certificates, are in digital format, it makes sense that SMS handling should be in digital format also. Furthermore, there are a few flag states, the Marshall Islands being one, that consider International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) to be part of the ISM Code. In such cases, the audits for ISM, ISPS, and the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) are usually carried out simultaneously, and there is a clear lack of efficiency if the documentation for each code is held separately in different locations. Digital solutions overcome this challenge.


Contrast such difficult and time- consuming manual handling with a holistic, digital system that is dynamic, inter-connected, and easily accessible by all stakeholders. Efficiency provided by digital technologies is driving change throughout the maritime sector, and perhaps nowhere is this change more needed than in the management of SMS requirements.


OneOcean website: www.oneocean.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128