search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
If you give, or are asked to provide expert witness in court, this case - totally unrelated to the marine sector - will make you think carefully about your role and how you approach your report.


The report There was criticism, too, about the way in which Mr Moore’s report was drafted.


This was triggered by his open admission in the report that it been made “from notes made by the lawyers [for the claimant] from what I have told them at face-to-face meetings with them and in telephone calls”. It was, therefore, unclear as to whether the report was actually Mr. Moore’s opinion or the lawyers’.


The judge ordered disclosure of the notes referred to in the report. Mr. Moore was cross examined in depth about his report and the following emerged:


- The report was drafted, amended and redrafted by the lawyers (albeit subject to Mr. Moore’s review).


- Mr Moore was asked questions by his lawyers in telephone calls and face-to-face meetings, over some months.


This could certainly look bad, both for the expert and for the lawyers. Having heard his evidence under cross examination, however, the judge concluded that:


- In revealing how the report came into being, Mr. Moore was being commendably candid with the court. - Mr Moore was a very careful witness, who made concessions “where appropriate”. - Mr Moore was “not someone who would put his name to a document that did not contain his views” and was “not just a conduit for the views of others”.


The lawyers were unusually involved for practical reasons. She noted that “Mr. Moore told the court, he rides horses, he does not sit at a computer”.


Conclusion Whilst this is purely an illustrative judgment (not an authority), experts would be well advised to take note.


What went in Mr. Moore’s favour were his transparency and his adherence to the evidence. Together, they demonstrated his compliance with his overriding duty to the court in a very difficult and tragic case. Judges place great weight on the way in which witnesses give their evidence. They assess the witness in front of them and always look for credibility, integrity, and straightforward helpfulness.


And, what about the outcome of the case? Well, the judge found in favour Mr Tylicki. This was not a case of mere lapses of judgement, but of reckless disregard for his safety.


IIMS is grateful to Nick Deal who authored this article, which was originally published on the Bond Solon website.


Bond Solon is the UK’s leading legal training and information company specifically for non-lawyers and offers a comprehensive range of Expert Witness courses. View their website at https://www.bondsolon.com. If you have any questions regarding Bond Solon training, please contact them directly either by telephone us on 020 7549 2549 or by email at expertwitness@bondsolon.com.


The Report • September 2022 • Issue 101 | 119


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128