search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Nautical Research Journal 73


1. Photograph of a man and wife in Dayton, Ohio, stranded on top of their front porch during the Great Flood of 1913. (Courtesy of Wright State University)


“River Cutter” Yocona pioneers technology on the nation’s rivers and desegregation in the Deep South By William H. T iesen


T roughout the history of the United States Coast Guard, the nation has tasked the Service with new missions to respond to all sorts of maritime threats and crises. Such was the case with the Great Flood of 1913, considered by many as the most devastating fl ood to strike the United States.


In the history of deadly American fl oods, the Great Flood of 1913 ranks only second in number of lives lost. T e 1889 Johnstown Flood distinguished itself


as the deadliest with approximately 2,200 victims killed in the small city of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. However, the 1913 fl ood aff ected over a dozen states, wiped out between 600 and 900 civilians, caused hundreds of millions in damage and made homeless 250,000 Americans.


As a consequence of this natural disaster, Congress voted to fund Federal fl ood relief and rescue work on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. And, on August 29, 1916, Congress passed a naval appropriations bill that included money for the construction of three “light- draſt river steamboats” for the Coast Guard. T eir mission was to “give relief, succor, and assistance to victims of fl oods” on the two major rivers. In addition to their specialized riverine duty, the cutters would support the usual Coast Guard missions of “rendering assistance to vessels in distress, saving life and property, protecting the revenue, enforcing the navigation and motor-boat laws, and prosecuting


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100