WATER PAGES
continuing global energy crisis and net zero targets mean increased efficiency is also a key driver for companies selecting technologies for their 2025-30 asset management plans (AMP8).
One way in which efficiencies can be gained is through disinfection technology selection. Ultraviolet (UV) treatment consumes less energy than other methods and as such is one of the most efficient forms of disinfection.
The technology uses UV light to irreparably damage the DNA of harmful microorganisms, effectively inactivating them. It is highly effective as part of a multi-barrier disinfection system even against chlorine-resistant pathogens like cryptosporidium and giardia, both common causes of waterborne disease outbreaks.
However, not all UV disinfection systems are made equal. There is wide variation in terms of capabilities and benefits, all of which can impact significantly on the performance of a disinfection system, installation and maintenance time required, and costs.
So, as well as compliance, what should utilities be demanding from UV disinfection technology? When it comes to installing technology, size matters. For existing sites that intend to convert or add UV disinfection to their treatment process, the right system not only saves on physical footprint where space is tight but also makes installation simpler and quicker.
Flexibility in installation is another benefit of UV systems, with options in flange
40
orientation and a choice between horizontal and vertical mounting. The access point for routine maintenance can also be adjusted to suit onsite conditions and configuration, ensuring seamless integration of the UV system into existing pipework.
With energy efficiency key to cost efficiency, it is important to ensure that the selected UV system can adjust power automatically to reflect real-time monitored operating conditions. This will realise significant energy savings compared to traditional technology, save significant costs, and support a site’s sustainability programme and net zero goals.
Xylem continues to invest in extensive research, development and testing of UV disinfection technology and, as a result, has added new additions to its Wedeco Spektron UV series.
Every day, over 50 million people globally rely on the series for safe drinking water. Now, as well as proven certification and validation in accordance with the latest
| April 2025 |
draintraderltd.com
global standards – including German DIN19294-1 and US EPA's UV Disinfection Guidance Manual (UVDGM) – the range delivers up to 50% reduction in energy consumption compared to previous models.
This saving is achieved through an optimised reactor design and the use of energy efficient Ecoray UV lamps, which have a variable power function and reduced mercury content, further minimising carbon footprint.
Size is another significant saving. Units are up to 50% smaller than competitor models, saving space and reducing installation time and budget.
Another area set to make a real difference to is faster maintenance. The Spektron UV systems have been designed with OptiMount, which enables lamp installation and exchange from both sides of the reactor. Coupled with this, remote connectivity enables real-time monitoring and control capabilities.
These are some of ways the systems help reduce downtime, lower maintenance costs, and contribute to improved accessibility for engineers, as well as safer lifting and handling.
Looking beyond compliance and health and safety, it is imperative that disinfection systems deliver a range of benefits that make a difference to a plant’s day-to-day operation, lifetime costs and sustainability performance. Today, this and more is possible thanks to continued innovation.
w
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76
