search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL MARKETS


CHILE SETS A HIGH BAR FOR SOVEREIGN SUSTAINABILITY-LINKED BONDS


IN OUR RECENT GREEN FINANCE ROUNDUP WITH COLLEAGUES IN CHINA, PROFESSOR MICHAEL MAINELLI, CHARTERED FCSI(HON), BROUGHT SOVEREIGN SUSTAINABILITY-LINKED BONDS TO THE FORE


Sovereign Sustainability-Linked Bonds: Chile Sets A High Bar


Supplement To The Ninth Edition Of The Global Green Finance Index April 2022


The concept was formally presented by Z/Yen at the World Bank Government Borrowers’ Forum in Ljubljana in May 2009, was included in the City of London’s submission to COP15 in Copenhagen, was promoted by the French government in the run-up to COP21 in 2015, and has been the subject of many papers and journal articles, most notably a 2017 French booklet, L’Innovation financière au service du climat: les obligations á impact environnemental, by Abdeldjellil Bouzidi and Michael Mainelli. SLBs began being issued by corporates in 2018, starting with French companies such as Danone and Louis Dreyfus. However, the original idea of ‘policy


Sustainable Futures


In March 2022, the Republic of Chile placed the first-ever sovereign sustainability-linked bond (SSLB). This US$2bn 20-year SSLB was more than four times oversubscribed – a remarkable achievement given the sovereign bond market’s volatility and uncertainty. Green policy performance bonds, sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs), and, most noteworthy, SSLBs form a subset of green bonds. However, they differ from green bonds, social bonds, or sustainability bonds in several crucial ways: • First, the funds raised are not tied to a specific project, but a corporate or national objective. Liberating the proceeds from a specific project frees the issuer to deliver sustainability improvements using a wide range of means.


• Second, SSLBs and SLBs are issued with specific sustainability performance targets (SPTs), which contain key performance indicators (KPIs), for example: “A 20% reduction in scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2030.”


• Third, if the SPT is missed, the bond is subject to a ‘step-up’ clause, meaning the bond interest increases.


CISI.ORG/REVIEW


performance bonds’ was directed at governments as a means of delivering on their climate change pledges (though they are equally suited to corporate issuers). In its simplest form, interest payments are linked to the actual greenhouse gas emissions of the issuing country. An investor in this bond receives an excess return if the issuing country’s emissions are above the government’s published target. For organisations and individuals seeking to invest in a low-carbon future, uncertainty about government commitment manifests itself in three specific risks: • government carbon emission targets being missed


• fossil fuel prices remaining low


• carbon (emissions) prices remaining low.


Missed targets, low fossil fuel prices, and low-carbon prices reduce the profitability of low-carbon projects and cause losses to investors. SSLBs act as a hedge against policy risk and can help attract both domestic and foreign direct investment in low carbon projects as they reduce government policy risk. Policy risk affects investment, for example when the worsening economic environment leads governments to talk about ‘temporary’ easing of carbon


reduction commitments, or there is a period of low fossil fuel prices, or when lobbying for special treatment of existing infrastructure looks strong. In the case of Chile, with the issuance of the world’s first SSLB, the country aims to embed green and financial incentives across several political cycles while mitigating some of the limitations of existing sovereign green, social, and sustainability instruments. Patricio Sepúlveda, head of debt


management at the Chile Ministry of Finance, points to “another interesting, and sometimes misunderstood, feature of Chile’s SSLB – its long maturity, of 20 years. The Sustainability Performance Targets will be verified in 2030 and 2032 and the potential step-up would be paid until 2042. This automatically ties several governments and administrations to the structure and climate actions. It is really a huge step that is, in our view, a game-changer.” We expect innovative countries,


// CHILE’S SSLB TIES SEVERAL GOVERNMENTS TO CLIMATE ACTIONS //


committed to targets such as net zero carbon emissions by 2050, to start issuing SSLBs following Chile’s lead. Numerous countries are currently considering SSLBs. Based on the corporate SLB market development from US$11bn in 2020 to US$110bn, one could imagine that SSLBs will represent 10% of


the green government issuance in a few years and, as a result, SSLB issuers will be under pressure to exhibit higher standards to differentiate their offerings. In the current economic environment of rising inflation and interest rates, SSLBs could even be more attractive than classic debt. If SPTs and KPIs are bold enough, the lower cost of funding should be a persuasive argument to convince governments to issue such instruments.


Professor Michael Mainelli is executive chair of Z/Yen. The full paper can be found at cisi.org/rofm-aug22.


75


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78