search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Figure 1: Shows residue/soap formation. Features an emulsion of HOCUT®


4260 and two benchmarks in Quaker Houghton’s proprietary recirculation test.


The frequency of coolant additions needed to maintain concentration can vary significantly depending on the product used. Using a proprietary stress test to evaluate emulsion stability and foam behaviour, Quaker Houghton compared the performance of its HOCUT®


4260 against several


coolants common to the aerospace industry. In addition to demonstrating excellent emulsion stability through a lack of residue and soap formation, HOCUT®


4260 provided a sustained low foaming profile and rapid foam break behaviour. [1]


One of the primary purposes of metalworking fluids is to provide cooling during metal removal operations. High temperatures generated in the machining process can facilitate the creation of stress points in finished products, potentially leading to cracking or other forms of failure resulting in scrappage. When controlling temperature, water is much more effective than air at heat transfer. As the level of air within a fluid increases (represented by foam/ entrained air) machining performance and tool life will suffer. This makes foam control and entrained air a very important aspect of metalworking fluid design. The ability of HOCUT®


4260 to rapidly release


air and generate low foam levels offers a significant advantage over the competition.


As well as compromising machining performance, excessive levels of foaming can also present challenges on the factory floor. Process solutions can sometimes foam out of the tank and create wet, slippery surfaces which are a significant safety concern. While this issue


16 LUBE MAGAZINE NO.189 OCTOBER 2025


can often be resolved by simply adding a de-foamer, this solution can become expensive and over prolonged periods of use, result in residue build-up and filter clogging.


Foam Collapse Time - Soft Water


Figure 2: Foam data showcasing the performance of HOCUT® common benchmarks.


4260 versus


4260 was evaluated against other aerospace coolants in the machining of titanium in a face milling operation. Conditions were varied to be consistent with both rough and finish milling operations. Under both conditions, HOCUT®


4260 offered a low wear


rate, low cutting power, and long tool life. This performance is supported by independent testing, which secured a leading aerospace standard for


In addition to emulsion stability and foam behaviour, the lubrication characteristics of the coolant itself can offer significant advantages to a machining operation. HOCUT®


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72