search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The overall engine lubricant demand in the European MHCV sector is substantial, accounting for a significant portion of the region’s total lubricants market. Annual lubricant consumption in 2025 is estimated to be over 800kMT3


growth, lubricant demand remains resilient due to the essential nature of commercial vehicle operations and the sustained need for maintenance. However, future demand is expected to face headwinds as electrification and alternative fuels penetrate the market, gradually reducing reliance on traditional internal combustion engines.


ACEA E8: A new benchmark for low-SAPS heavy duty lubricants Introduced in May 2022, ACEA E8 replaces the long-standing ACEA E6 category, which first brought low-SAPS oils to prominence in 2004. ACEA E8 is designed with modern Euro VI engines in mind and is a significant increase in performance in many areas. This new benchmark in performance places increased emphasis on:


• Piston cleanliness • Oxidation performance • Stay-in-grade performance • Compatibility with EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) and SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) systems


ACEA E8 oils must meet stringent requirements for oxidation stability, aeration control, and wear protection, making them ideal for engines equipped with diesel particulate filters and operating on low-sulfur fuels.


The introduction of the OM471 piston cleanliness test (CEC L-118-21) marks a significant evolution in lubricant testing. Replacing the OM501LA test, OM471 is more severe, with a 600-hour duration and higher thermal stress, reflecting the demands of modern Euro VI engines.


Complexity in the low-SAPS HD market The European heavy-duty engine oil market is growing in complexity. The rise in complexity of multiple viscosity grades in heavy-duty (HD) low-SAPS lubricants in Europe is driven by diverse engine designs and stricter Euro VI emissions standards. Fleets require lubricants that suit various operating conditions, from cold starts to high-load haulage, leading to a broader range of viscosity grades. Each


10 LUBE MAGAZINE NO.189 OCTOBER 2025


Lubrizol analysis. Based in part on content supplied by IHS Markit – Worldview, 2024


. Despite the parc’s slow


grade must deliver optimal protection, fuel efficiency, and compatibility with after treatment systems, making formulation more challenging. Lubricant producers must balance base oil selection, additive chemistry, and performance requirements, resulting in advanced, specialised products tailored to specific engines and regulatory needs.


There are now five distinct viscosity profiles commonly used in HD applications which require low-SAPS lubricants. These are shown in the chart which gives the relative split of these lubricants based on Lubrizol analysis.


Viscosity Grade Complexity in low-SAPS HD


This proliferation reflects the need for tailored solutions across different OEM platforms and operating environments.


Increasing complexity in lubricant formulation, especially with multiple viscosity grades and low-SAPS requirements, poses significant challenges for lubricant blenders in terms of plant capacity and logistics.


Handling a broader portfolio of products demands more storage tanks, blending equipment, and dedicated lines to prevent cross-contamination. Frequent changeovers between different formulations reduce operational efficiency, increase downtime, and require rigorous cleaning protocols. The need for precise blending of advanced additives and base oils further complicates production planning and throughput.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72