search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REGULATION


ILSAC GF-6: A Work in Progress


Dr. Raj Shah, and Mr. Christan Abraham, Koehler Instrument Company, Holtsville, NY ILSAC GF-1


Introduction


The automotive industry has been patiently awaiting ILSAC GF-6, a new engine oil category for passenger vehicles and light trucks in the United States. GF-6 has been a long and difficult road plagued with delays due to the unprecedented number of new engine tests and seemingly endless complications. Finally, at the Automotive Oil Advisory Panel (AOAP) meeting held on 3 April 2019, stakeholders agreed on final test limits, and first release has been balloted as of 1 May 2020. The new ILSAC specification comes in two parts, GF6A for legacy viscosity grades and GF6B for SAE XW-16 oils.


History


Prior to ILSAC’s formation in 1992, engine oil standards were issued under the Tripartite System headed by the following organisations: American Petroleum Institute (API), Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)1


The ILSAC GF-1 standard indicates the oil meets both API SH and the Energy Conserving II (EC-II) requirements. It was created in 1990 and upgraded in 1992 and became the minimum requirement for oil used in American and Japanese automobiles.


ILSAC GF-2


ILSAC GF-2 replaced GF-1 in 1996. The oil must meet both API SJ and EC-II requirements. The GF-2 standards require 0W-30, 0W-40, 5W-20, 5W-30, 5W-40, 5W-50, 10W-30, 10W-40 and 10W-50 motor oils to meet stringent requirements for phosphorus content, low temperature operation, high temperature deposits and foam control.


ILSAC GF-3


An ILSAC GF-3 an oil must meet both API SL and the EC-II requirements. The GF-3 standard has more stringent parameters regarding long-term effects of the oil on the vehicle emission system, improved fuel economy and improved volatility, deposit control and viscosity performance. The standard also requires less additive degradation and reduced oil consumption rates over the service life of the oil.


ILSAC GF-4


ILSAC GF-4 is similar to the API SM service category, but it requires an additional sequence VIB Fuel Economy Test (ASTM D6837).


. However, this conglomerate


was unable to meet the needs of the automobile industry in a timely manner. Thus, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) and the Japan Automotive Standards Organization (JASO) founded the International Lubricants Standardization and Approval Committee (ILSAC) to quickly adapt to the rapidly changing landscape. The Tripartite System and ILSAC merged to form the Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System (EOCLS). Each governing body in EOCLS has functions in a different capacity. ILSAC sets the minimum performance standards. While SAE determines the needs of engine oil specifications based on automaker inputs and market trends, ASTM develops tests and parameters for each specification provided by SAE. API licenses and certifies the engine oils.


40 LUBE MAGAZINE NO.153 OCTOBER 2019 ILSAC GF-5


Introduced in October 2010 for 2011 and older vehicles, designed to provide improved high temperature deposit protection for pistons and turbochargers, more stringent sludge control, improved fuel economy, enhanced emission control system compatibility, seal compatibility, and protection of engines operating on ethanol-containing fuels up to E85.


Figure 1: All licensed ILSAC engine oil standards2


Reasons for GF-6 ILSAC GF-1 through GF-4 have made gradual improvements to fuel economy and lubricant efficiency, but the current GF-5 standard has made significant advances. This change in tempo coincides with the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) legislation issued under the Obama Administration in 2010. As a result, a two-phase national programme was installed. Phase I affected


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72