search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
By CATHERINE CHETWYND


  chief executive, Maiden Voyage


a choice: if there is information available that answers some of those vulnerabilities, it’s up to them whether they engage with it but if they feel vulnerable, it’s there. We launched SOLO last year to find the hotels that go above and beyond to meet the needs of the UK’s female business travellers. It is about being pragmatic and sensible, and there is some information that is helpful for female travellers. They can choose whether this influences their decisions or not. Men can also look at it but it is being driven by females, who nominate hotels on the Redfern website. I don’t think it is about having a travel programme specifically for women, but I do think hotels that go the extra mile to resolve some of these vulnerabilities should be flagged within a programme so that women can make the choice.





but I don’t think a separate policy is appropriate. The overlap between men and women is so great that there are only a few things organisations need to do to make sure they are applying the correct duty-of-care for female business travellers, and that is where they fall down. I recently spoke at duty-of-care conference for travel risk managers, who are often male and ex-military. Quite a lot of them said: ‘we know we should be having these conversations with our female travellers but we shy away from it rather than facing it head on’ – some of them had had their head bitten off by someone who said: ‘why are you giving me this advice when you wouldn’t say this to a man?’. It is potentially tricky ground because if something does happen to a woman that is related to their gender and their employer hasn’t briefed them or done risk assessment, they can have a case against their employer. And in reality, if a woman reports sexual assault in the UAE, she’s liable to be arrested


for having unlawful sex, or if she uses inappropriate body language or gives public displays of affection in the Middle East, she could be in danger. You risk offending the people you have gone there to do business with and losing the business deal. It is also about training. One-in-four female travellers has a negative incident while


travelling on business, and half of those relate to sexual harassment. We have developed e-learning modules that are gender specific: if you are travelling in this country, you may want to observe a more conservative dress code, it wouldn’t be appropriate to shake hands or initiate a handshake or make long eye contact. That will make a difference. It will enable them to reduce the risk of anything happening to them, and to have a plan B and plan C they can activate to avoid the risk escalating. My message to employers is, have the conversation. If you have the right intention and tone, women travellers will have a more amazing business trip and be more successful. If they take offence, it says more about them than it does about you.


 


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158