search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GUEST COLUMN KASEY CHAPPELLE Data protection 2.0


What does the upcoming GDPR really mean for the business travel industry?





  a business traveller won’t make it far from home.


Essential information, including name, passport number, birth date and much more, is shared between companies in a complex ecosystem. It may go from travel buyer to online booking tool to travel management company (TMC) to global distribution system (GDS) to travel supplier, with many subcontractors in between. But who is responsible if, somewhere between booking and boarding, the data is misused or breached? That’s one question the


business travel industry will have to consider by May 2018, when the new EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and its strict penalties and higher compliance expectations come into play. Data protection laws have applied since the Data Protection Directive came into force in the 1990s. GDPR is data protection 2.0, closing gaps that emerged since the directive was enacted. What does it change, and why does it matter for business travel?


 Data protection law divides organisations into controllers – organisations directly responsible for the data; and processors – subcontractors who process data on behalf of a controller. But travel is complex, and participants may disagree on their role. The travel buyer, GDS and travel supplier are all directly responsible as controllers for their respective activities. For other players, it’s not so clear; for example, what role does the TMC play?


 Given the services TMCs Kasey


Chappelle is chief privacy officer for American


Express Global Business Travel. She leads the company’s privacy risk management programme. Previously, Chappelle had similar roles at Vodafone Group in London, and Ebay in California. She began her career in regulatory law at Willkie Farr & Gallagher in Washington, DC.


provide and the decisions they make, all TMCs are likely controllers under the law. This is best for clients, too – the TMC is in the best position to design privacy programmes specifically for travel data and to take direct legal responsibility for their compliance. Recent events have shown little clarity about responsibilities for remedying breaches, particularly when they happen at companies that underpin so much travel data infrastructure. Industries can better define where responsibilities lie by making use of the new emphasis GDPR places on cooperative standards, including industry codes of conduct.


 We talk a lot about traveller- centricity and the consumerisation of business technology. Travel is adopting the big data advances of the consumer technology giants; we should be careful not to adopt their privacy problems, too. When we use big data, when we track location for duty-of-care, or when we put virtual assistants in booking tools, privacy protection must be built in right from the start. GDPR mandates privacy by design – a long-standing best practice of building privacy into a technology from the outset rather than expecting lawyers to solve it at the end. Travel buyers who work with innovative, data-driven companies need to have confidence that privacy is incorporated into product development from concept to launch. Not only is this the law, it’s also how to build privacy- protective travel technologies.


 The new law doesn’t just affect how services are built, but also how they’re communicated to the traveller. Under GDPR, consent must be specific, unbundled from other terms, and revocable – not a mandatory tick box next to a long and legalistic privacy statement. This is going to be one of the biggest challenges of GDPR. Most travel processes are particularly unsuited to consent. You can’t revoke permission to use your passport number and still expect to fly. Consent has been overused in situations where it’s not appropriate, but structured so that it was never a real consent anyway. Instead, data should only be collected when it’s used for purposes unrelated to the core travel services – like marketing – where it can be meaningfully granted and easily revoked.


 In travel, as in every industry, there’s a renewed focus on data – the oil of the information economy. All GDPR requires companies to do is build sustainable data practices, respecting fundamental human rights. The sky isn’t falling – remember GDPR is an evolution, not a revolution. But some companies may not be prepared, especially small- and medium-sized businesses that do not have the personnel or the resources to build a comprehensive privacy programme. Travel buyers should work with companies that have created GDPR-ready programmes tailored to travel, and are willing to take on the direct responsibility as a data controller.


 


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158