search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems



       If so, you may have been unwittingly influenced by so-called ‘nudge theory’ – the idea that by giving people small nudges you can influence behaviour on the large scale. Many local authorities have erected signs saying that 95 per cent of dog owners are responsible and bag their dog poo. It has been shown to work. HMRC, after carrying out a trial on 100,000 taxpayers, now says in its reminder letters that ‘nine out of 10 people in the UK pay their tax on time’; it claims to have increased tax revenues by £210 million as a result. But can nudge theory be used in business


travel to influence behaviour and help travel buyers make savings? Severnside Consulting’s Chris Pouney thinks it can. “Nudge theory has been adopted by more than 70 governments globally which rec- ognise that spending time developing the right choice architecture is critical when attempting to influence citizens to make, what they consider as ‘the right choices’.”


 It is not a new idea. Visual guilt – long talked about as the lever that can influence behaviour in online booking tools – is still alive and well, and nudges travellers to make ‘good choices’. Traffic light signals are used as a nudge


behaviour tool by a number of booking tool providers, indicating which suppliers are preferred, other suppliers and those that are non-compliant, perhaps because they breach a rate cap. This visual signal can be used to influence behaviour towards





green-lighted suppliers – the travellers’ subconscious does the rest. “We learn it from a being a child,” says


Click Travel’s director of operations Chris Vince. “When something is red, avoid it.” But Pouney thinks it’s less effective with certain people. “Would visual guilt work on a CEO or a road warrior who feels it’s their right to travel in first class?” he asks. “I’m not so sure. I see a number of companies who install technology and new influence approaches and end up finding out what they knew already – that the policy is not being used by one group of people.”


 Traffic light behaviour is not a given, and Egencia senior director Jean-Noel Lau Keng Lun suggests looking at real data instead. “We can all read the studies that say that the colour green will encourage and the colour red will discourage behaviours, but we can do more: you can actually test your assumptions by testing a green button and a red button and see what happens. Sometimes you will see totally unexpected behaviours,” he says. Click Travel is using subtle techniques to influence hotel booking behaviour in its booking tool. “If I am a traveller and I have only just joined the company, and I am booking a trip to London for the first time, some of the hotels that others in the company stay in would feature higher up in the results,” says Vince.


This has the effect of concentrating hotel spend in fewer properties, giving greater leverage in negotiations and promoting hotels that travellers may like more, particularly when coupled with user- generated reviews.


The app environment, which many younger travellers feel more comfortable


working within, can also help. “Travel managers can adopt apps as primary vehicles for providing short-form, proac- tive communication, such as on-demand travel policy tips or timely travel data to travellers,” says American Express GBT vice-president Jason Geall. “Automated notifications can also be set up to inform travellers whether their booking is within policy or not. The real- time communication, delivered in formats travellers already use, will do much more to guide compliance than lengthy rules or complicated communications rolled out quarterly or annually.” Geall says the company’s research shows that 44 per cent of travel managers, pre- dominately at large corporations, have introduced apps and a further 19 per cent intend to introduce them within the next two years.


Companies such as EY are using robotics and messaging to influence behaviour (see box, page 112). To work well, messaging around issues such as advance booking windows and out-of-policy bookings is going to have to become more person- alised, argues Capita Travel and Events’ chief information officer Paul Saggar. “The types of automated emails and pop-ups we’ve seen in the market are largely generic – they will only work to a certain extent because everyone gets the same message, regardless of how, where, when and why they meet, travel or book. Personalised and dynamic content is the only way buyers will achieve real, long- term influence and change that gives them the results desired by their different stakeholders,” he says. Capita Travel and Events is bringing its parent company’s expertise in nudge be- haviour – it employs a team of behavioural


 


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158