search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WORDS IAN SKUSE


LEGAL


around the world. Heathrow has announced the installation of upgraded security scanners, using “computed tomography” to show 3-D images of the contents of baggage, which will finally remove the requirement to put liquids from baggage into sealed plastic bags and to remove laptops. Heathrow will lead the way for this new technology and will also expand its current use of facial recognition technology (FRT) so that passengers will not have to verify their identity on various occasions as they pass through the terminal. We are in an age where technology is moving faster than regulation, and questions have to be asked concerning data protection, privacy, and consent, and how this data is used, kept or destroyed.


B


FACIAL RECOGNITION LAW New proposed legislation was introduced during March 2019 – with the Commercial Facial Recognition Privacy Act under which notification would be given when facial recognition information is used or collected, and third-party testing would be required to ensure the data is unbiased and limiting how it is to be used. There is considerable support for these new laws to require privacy and tight regulation concerning use of FRT. The US Customs and Border Protection Department proposes to use facial recognition technology on more than 100 million


buyingbusinesstravel.com


USINESS TRAVELLERS ARE LIKELY TO experience a changing security environment at airports both here in the UK and


FACE UP TO DATA FEARS


Technology is moving faster than regulation. How is travellers’ right to privacy protected?


passengers taking international flights out of the US. Critics say the technology has not been allowed to develop and may not always be accurate, leading to misidentity. Once passengers have passed through security checks, the data should be deleted. Strong technical and security safeguards should be put in place.


EUROPE: PERSONAL DATA The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) makes it clear biometric information is “personal data” controlled under these regulations. Article 9 sets out biometric data (including FRT used to identify a person) as within a special category banned from processing unless exceptional circumstances apply. Any data which identifies an


individual, or which might do so when combined with other data, counts as “personal data” and is regulated. This includes the digital fingerprints of facial recognition. There needs to be a lawful basis to process this data which could include the consent of the passenger,


IT IS LIKELY


REGULATORS WILL EXPECT MUCH HIGHER LEVELS OF SECURITY


“legitimate interests” and processing necessary to perform a contract or comply with a legal obligation.


RELYING ON CONSENT If the processor of FRT intends to use the data for commercial purposes and seeks to rely upon consent of the subject, then the consent must be “informed” and the passenger should be given information before any processing of the “fingerprint” takes place. This might be achieved by signs and displayed information and guidance. The individual should be given the right to object to their personal data being used, particularly for commercial activities, such as direct marketing.


It is likely that regulators will


expect much higher levels of security and anonymisation to prevent misuse and breach of FRT data. Retention of the data “fingerprints” should be justified and must be carefully monitored.


EXPECT REGULATOR ACTION The use of FRT is more than a security issue. Consent, privacy and strict rules should be in place to ensure data is not misused. With the rapid expansion of this technology, we should expect action from the regulators to


prevent commercial exploitation of the harvested data.


Ian Skuse is a partner in Blake Morgan’s Travel team (blakemorgan.co.uk) He welcomes your feedback: ian.skuse@blakemorgan.co.uk


2019 JULY/AUGUST 97


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100