search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ACCORDING TO AMON


WORDS AMON COHEN


TIME FOR SOME STRONG LANGUAGE


Strong Customer Authentication will transform online card purchases from September, but even at this late stage it remains unclear how corporate payments will be affected


O YOU HAVE 14 September ringed in red on your calendar? If not, it’s time to reach for your marker pen. A financial crisis started in the UK on 14 Septem- ber 2007 with a run on Northern Rock, the first in this country for 150 years. This year, 14 September could trigger a minor crisis for travel managers unless they prepare, because that’s the day Strong Cus- tomer Authentication (SCA) becomes man- datory in the European Economic Area (the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, as any pub quiz anorak will tell you). SCA is a requirement to provide secondary verification for online card payments, such as entering a PIN texted to a cardholder’s phone, or biometric identification. I covered this subject in the Corporate Cards and Payments 2019 supplement accompanying BBT’s last issue. So why am I bringing it up again? Because, at the time of writing, there has been minimal communication from travel management and payment companies about how SCA could affect many corporate travel programmes. The inactivity is understandable because no one is sure precisely how business travel payments will be affected. SCA was designed primarily to reduce consumer card fraud but it has generated unintended consequences for corporate travel that have not yet been fully mitigated. The unknowns include:


D


• There is uncertainty around the extent to which plastic corporate cards for transac-


from SCA, but issuers can’t be sure until they receive an official response to their exemption application.


• There is even speculation that texting PINs to cardholders’ phones may be considered


tions through TMCs and corporate booking tools are exempted.


• National regulators could interpret the rules slightly differently, especially a


• Each issuer must then decide how to follow those rules – for example, will


• In the UK, the regulator has said virtual and lodge cards are “potentially” exempt


they deem plastic corporate cards subject to SCA in all circumstances?


vaguely worded exemption for “secure cor- porate payment processes and protocols”.


an unacceptable authentication method in some EU countries. I read advice about SCA sent out by one issuer late last year and some of it looked plain wrong to me, so you can understand the reluctance by others to commit themselves. In spite of these many uncertainties, some action points are already clear. There is little doubt your business will have to change its payment arrangements whenever the booker and payer are not one and the same person. If, for example, a corporate card is used to pay for online bookings for more than one person, that will likely have to stop. Likewise admins will no longer be able to pay for online bookings by entering their travellers’ corporate card details. It’s also fairly clear that virtual and lodge cards will attract SCA less than anything paid for with plastic. So be aware change is coming and knock urgently on the doors of your TMC and card provider to ask what prep you should be doing.


Amon Cohen is a specialist


business travel writer, conference moderator and media trainer


ADMINS WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO PAY FOR ONLINE


BOOKINGS BY ENTERING THEIR TRAVELLERS’ CORPORATE CARD DETAILS


46 JULY/AUGUST 2019


THE FREQUENT FLYER FREEBIE I was very interested to read that in October Qantas will fly an Airbus A380 from Mel- bourne to Tokyo bookable only using mileage redemptions on its frequent-flyer scheme. I don’t know how much it costs the airline to fly 484 people all that way for no fare (although there is speculation it’s an otherwise empty leg to collect punters returning from the Japa- nese Grand Prix), but I do know Qantas isn’t a charity. Since many of the 484 passengers ac- cumulated their mileage through flights paid for by their employers, it’s Qantas’s corporate clients who indirectly ponied up for much of that 10h 25min trip on a superjumbo.


buyingbusinesstravel.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100