search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY


don’t – and for corporates looking for a technology partner, there are arguments in favour of both types. The list of those companies that develop


their own in-house technology includes HRG, Capita Travel and Events, and Hill- gate Travel. Antoine Boatwright, Hillgate’s CIO, says the difference between working with a technology provider directly and a TMC with their own technology is like the difference between handling “a super- tanker or speedboat”. “Technology companies are very pro- cess-driven; they are offshored and the distance between the coder and the person with the requirement is so large that it takes a long time to turn into product,” says Boatwright. Despite that, there can be advantages. “Some tech providers have the scale that allows them to negotiate on a much larger basis with third parties you might wish to engage with,” he says. However, technologies such as the cloud have enabled TMCs to scale quickly. “TMCs, meanwhile, understand travel


first hand and they see it from the oper- ations side. They see the requirements and the service delivery and can optimise both,” he adds. The pharma buyer clearly believes


that owning the technology relationship directly with providers, particularly the online booking tool, is vital and that managing them at arm’s length through a TMC does not work well. “I have seen it in the past from other jobs. You get so much more mileage if the technology is firmly in your hands,” she says.


“Some tech providers have the scale that allows them to negotiate on a much larger basis with third parties you might wish to engage with”


On a journey: Parexel’s technology strategy


BIOPHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES COMPANY Parexel has more than 18,000 employees worldwide, with its headquarters in Massachusetts and annual revenues of more than US$2 billion.


Over the past eight years, the company has embarked on a journey to make its travel programme world-class, and ensure


BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM


it is anchored in a robust technology strategy. Ben Park, Parexel’s


director of procurement & travel, takes the view that the approach to travel technology is unique for each company. “There is no one- size-fits-all solution,” he says. That said, there are some key ideas that are universal – the need to go digital without exception,


to simplify and standardise processes, to centralise payments, to build highly scalable processes and let systems communicate with each other. For Parexel, the starting point was to use technology to collect global data about their company in terms of number of countries, the age and gender split of employees, etc, with the aim


of designing a programme that meets the needs of each diverse travel group. Each generation has different needs and gender mix plays a role in a travel programme set up as well. Parexel’s technology


journey can then be split into four levels; core, basic, advanced and master. These are summarised as follows: (continued on p87)


BBT January/February 2018 85


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148