search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PATIENT SAFETY


team to educate patients on important steps to improve and maintain their health.


 A reduction in medication errors: Pre-automation 48 prescriptions included errors, during the course of the study the number of errors recorded were just seven and this was a result of human error post dispensing by the machine – further staff training has now helped to reduce this further still.


 Developing the commercial potential of the Trust: The study and process validation has enabled the Trust to approach neighbouring Acute Trusts to offer a safe and reliable dispensing system for their patients’ medication adherence packs. This will provide the Trust with a new revenue stream as well as saving the Acute Trusts money, as they will no longer have to outsource from external organisations.


Access to the cabinets is managed by secure fingerprint recognition and this, along with a lockable drawer system, is said to guarantee that the security of controlled drugs is maximised. Both factors are of paramount importance for any mental health setting. Since introducing the cabinets, the hospital has seen an 11.7% reduction in drug spend based on a 16-month comparison. This is a financial saving of £6k per ward per year. There is now a more efficient medication supply chain in place across the wards, which has led to a further reduction in waste and loss of expired medication. Pharmacy stock wastage has reduced from 1% to 0%, which is a further £6000 saving per year. In addition to this, nurses have also reduced the time they spend on medicines management by 50%. Nurses now spend more time on face to face patient care which brings its own patient safety benefits. The cabinets have contributed to a 64% reduction in reports relating to controlled drugs. This is said to be due to the security the cabinet provides and the support


available for nurses managing stock balances. The number of ad-hoc/unplanned orders has fallen from 77% to 25%, as the medication supply chain is more pro-active and medication is now available to ward staff when it is needed – in fact 99.75% of medication is available for administration when and where needed. Workload is now planned and ordering automated. This has resulted in reliable inventory management. Maule asserted: “Since introducing automation at the Trust, there has been a 71% increase in pharmacy clinical interventions, as clinical pharmacy staff have been freed up from the medicines supply chain and are now more involved in patient facing roles, where they are better placed to make timely interventions to improve quality of care. “The Trust has had really positive experiences with technology and automation and now has valuable and skilled staff doing the most appropriate tasks and having the greatest impact on patient safety and experience.”


Safeguarding against medication errors


Over three quarters (79%) of medication errors within secondary care4


happen during


the administration process – so it’s vital that Trusts put systems in place to safeguard against this.


Errors are exacerbated by the increasing volume of work, staff shortages and the sheer rising number of patients accessing health services. So, if we are going to accept that this situation is not going to change in the near future, then we need to offer support for valued and indispensable frontline staff. Introducing electronic prescribing and medicines administration (ePMA) systems in hospitals has the potential to halve the risk of medication errors. However, in November 2017, just 35% of acute Trusts (where more than 80% of inpatients’ prescriptions are written digitally), and less


than 12% of mental health organisations had introduced the necessary systems.5 When using ePMA systems as a standalone process, patient safety is improved to a certain degree, however it doesn’t protect against the nurse picking the wrong drug, the wrong dose, out of date stock from the drugs cupboard or administering medication to the wrong patient. To help eradicate medication errors, a system to ‘close the loop’ is also needed. This includes automated dispensing, electronic confirmation of patient identity and medication administration records. This approach to administering medication allows Trusts to track everything back to the patient from the moment the medication is prescribed to when it is administered. In my opinion, there really is no excuse for poor medicines management within the NHS and our aim at Omnicell is to campaign and continue to share best practice and learning through medication-based automation. This includes demonstrating the efficiencies that ward based technology can provide to healthcare professionals managing medication and ensuring quality care remains at the forefront of our NHS. CSJ


References


1 Prevalence & Economic Burden of Medication Errors in the NHS in England. Policy and Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Care Interventions. Universities of Sheffield & York.


2 WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm. https://www.who.int/patientsafety/policies/ global-launch-medication-without-harm-Bonn/en/


3 Data by Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust


4 http://www.eepru.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2018/02/eepru-report- medicaiotn-error-feb-2018.pdf


5 The Report of the Short Life Working Group on reducing medication-related harm. Dept of Health and Social Care (Feb 2018).


AUGUST 2019


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM I


89


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92