search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THEATRE DESIGN


excluded specific types of operating theatre equipped with large equipment, such as X- ray units used for angiography, CT or MRI units, or surgical robots..


Calculation of OT size using our model


We classified operating theatre type into six categories based on size, i.e. minimum OT, standard OT, ideal OT, OT for cardiac surgery, OT for specific surgery, and OT for multi- subspecialty surgery. In our model, we apportioned an additional area to the movement of equipment and people, in addition to the area devoted specifically to equipment. For the sake of research, we selected 13 representative surgical procedures – including lens surgery, brain tumour surgery, head and neck surgery, coronary bypass (CABG) surgery, thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, lung cancer surgery, oesophageal cancer surgery, hepatobiliary/pancreatic surgery, colorectal cancer surgery, spinal surgery, arthroscopic surgery, obstetrics/gynaecological (OBGY) surgery, and urological surgery. We assigned lens surgery to the standard operating theatre, head and neck surgery, lung cancer surgery, oesophageal cancer surgery, hepatobiliary/pancreatic surgery, colorectal surgery, OBGY surgery, and urological surgery, to the ‘ideal’ OT, and brain tumour surgery, spinal surgery, and arthroscopic surgery, to an OT for specific surgery. Cardiac surgery included CABG and surgery for thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysm. No procedure was assigned to either a ‘minimum’ OT or an OT for multi- subspecialty surgery.


Validity of our model


Since our model is predominantly based on the area in the theatre occupied by healthcare workers and their movement/ traffic pathway, the remaining space is considered to be the equipment area. To validate our model, we used the ratio of this equipment area to total OT size as an indicator. Equipment used in the


Trolley for anaesthetic drug


Anaesthesia machine


6.0 m 6.0 m 36 m2 Trolley for surgical instrument Figure 3. The ‘minimum’ OT. 48 m2 Figure 4. The ‘standard’ OT. Table 2. Average ratio Area for routinely used 11.87


of area of equipment in OT. Area for


equipment (m2) equipment (m2 1.52


temporarily used OT size of routinely used total area of ) (m2


Average Ratio of area )


78.46


operating theatre consisted of the equipment routinely used in ordinary surgery and that temporarily used for specific surgery. The former equipment includes the operating table and anaesthetic machine, and the latter a heart lung machine, surgical microscope, or surgical navigation system. We calculated the average equipment size and OT size using the operative records and equipment usage at our hospital during April 2011. The actual footprint of the equipment was measured beforehand, as shown in Table 1, while we estimated the ratio of equipment size using our model based on the type of theatre. The total equipment area was calculated by subtracting the total space apportioned to healthcare workers, the patient, and their movement/traffic pathway/


equipment 0.15


equipment 0.17


practice, from the estimated OT size, using Equation 1. We compared the measured ratio in our hospital’s operative records with the calculated ratio according to the OT classification.


4 Practicality of our model


In the next stage of our research, we assessed the practicality of our model using the degree of satisfaction of the theatre directors (medical or nurse OT directors) of 43 national university hospitals nationwide. We sent them a questionnaire asking which OT was most frequently assigned to 13 representative procedures. They were asked whether they were happy with the size of OTs currently used for the aforementioned procedures. They were also asked to provide


Ratio of


Standard-sized operating theatre


Rear table for surgical instruments


Standard-sized operating theatre


Cell saver


Cardiopulmonary bypass


Table for specimens


2.0 m 64 m2 Figure 5. The ‘ideal’ OT. 36 I WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM 6.0 m 2.0 m 6.0 m 2.0 m 80 m2 Figure 6. The OT for cardiac surgery. AUGUST 2019


8.0 m


6.0 m


8.0 m


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92