search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVE RTI S ING F EATUR E


are now available in 30 countries worldwide with: l 1,000 units in the UK across 216 hospitals and clinics


l 1,600 units in total EMEA l 23,500 units in North America across 5,000 institutes, including all luminary hospitals


There are now more than 150 procedures that use ultrasound probes across a wide variety of healthcare settings, including but not limited to early pregnancy, gynaecology, fertility, cardiovascular, radiology, urology and emergency medicine.


Each of these caries a risk of cross- contamination between patients due to contact with mucous membranes, non-intact skin and/or sterile tissues. Whether or not an ultrasound probe requires sterilisation, HLD or low level disinfection (LLD) depends on its Spaulding Classification.2-4 For example, endocavitary probes (which include transvaginal ultrasound probes) are classified as semi-critical medical devices, meaning they require HLD between patients and the additional use of a sheath.1-3,5-17 Any ultrasound probes that come into contact with sterile tissues or the bloodstream are considered critical medical devices. Contact with sterile tissues can occur in procedures such as biopsies, scanning open wounds and intra-operative procedures. Many ultrasound probes cannot be sterilised and some guidelines permit HLD in lieu of sterilisation for critical probes so long as a sterile sheath is also used. 4,7 In a first of its kind, a large population study commissioned by national health authorities in Scotland revealed that there was an “unacceptable risk” of patient infection following LLD.


Almost one million people (982,911) were followed over a 6 year period via linked national health databases. Of these 60.698 patients underwent transvaginal (TV) ultrasound. Results showed that: - 41% of people in this group had a greater risk of infection than patients who had not undergone a TV ultrasound18


- 26% of these patients had a greater risk of antibiotic prescription in the 30 days following a TV ultrasound18


It is encouraging to see the growing number of Trophon devices being installed throughout the healthcare systems of the UK and Europe. The number of devices reflect the strengthening fundamentals for adoption seen as international guidelines show support for automated HLD practices. European guidelines, including those from the UK, recommend automated disinfection for semi-critical medical devices, including ultrasound probes.1,3,5,8,10,12-14,16


JANUARY 2022


When it comes to HLD, automation is recommended as best practice for several reasons.


Prevention of human error The first is the introduction of human error when manual processing is done, from error in the disinfection procedure itself to errors in record-keeping. In addition, manual processing and record-keeping can be time consuming and complex which may have a knock-on effect on patient workflow efficiencies.


Validated and reproducible results Automation provides greater reliability and reproducibility of the disinfection process for every patient.


It ensures the disinfection process achieves expected microbiological outcomes consistently and produces reliable documentation.


Traceability Finally, automation allows for digitised traceability capabilities. Traceability is essential to protect institutions and patients with documented evidence of effective HLD. Nanosonics recognises the need for continued education and support in this space, which is why they have supported the development of the Ultrasound Infection Prevention Toolkit, a free peer-reviewed resource brought to life by a collective of clinical decontamination experts in the UK and Ireland.


The kit contains four editable tools to assist with locating ultrasound probes, within an organisation, assessment of procedure-specific ultrasound policy and practice, the development of policies that can be implemented at various levels. Access the Ultrasound Infection


Prevention Toolkit at: www. ultrasoundinfectionprevention.org.uk


Looking to the future, Nanosonics is pleased to announce that they have partnered with Soluscope, an Ecolab company, to provide exclusive distribution for the Soluscope Serie TEE probe washer- disinfector in the UK.


The reliable, fast and efficient device provides complete cleaning and disinfection to the machine function integrate leak test cycle in only 14 minutes and a single handling, reducing probe damage risks to a minimum. The addition of the Soluscope Serie TEE probe washer to the product offering in the UK will allow Nanosonics to continue to champion and support the adoption of HLD for ultrasound probes.


Up to 22 million patients are protected


every year from the risk of ultrasound probe cross-contamination by Nanosonics’ Trophon technology.


By transforming the way infection prevention practices are understood and conducted, Nanosonics seeks to deliver improved standards of patient care.


References for this article are available on https://www.clinicalservicesjournal.com/ story/37298/from-0-to-1-000


Nanosonics Europe Ltd. Unit 2 Linfit Court, Colliers Way Clayton West, Huddersfield HD8 9WL United Kingdom.


Tel: 01484 860581


Email: ukinfo@nanosonics.co.uk, Website: www.nanosonics.co.uk.


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM l 7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84