search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HOSPITAL CONSTRUCTION


the conversation on lifecycle costs to materials and other upfront capital investments is lazy; it is to ignore well over 90% of the story just because detailed data is not (currently) readily available.


Adaptable estate Some areas of the hospital require frequent alteration, others occasional. Just how radical and disruptive depends on how the facility was designed and then built. We all know the pressure for changes throughout the design and construction periods, and then almost from the point that the healthcare facility becomes operational on day one. MMC can be far more flexible and adaptable than traditional build, or vastly less so; 3D modular tends toward the latter. GSTT’s adaptable estate strategy (which ETL helped to develop, alongside our client, and design consultants and architects, NBBJ, and Mott MacDonald)3


is


designed to provide sufficient adaptability to support 30-year cycles between significant alterations. Very importantly, it also addresses the need to allow changes to occur with minimal impact on operational areas of the hospital. At one level, we need to be able shut down a floor or part of a floor, and on the other, to perform routine and planned maintenance or replacement in a room or ceiling void without affecting patients or clinical activity, or compromising infection control. MMC can help with that, but there is an upfront premium.


Risk of premature obsolescence Depending on typology, change may be impractical or impossible. Surprising numbers of hospital facilities are demolished before their thirtieth year, less than their first standard lifecycle of 35-40 years. There is no single failed typology meeting that fate. It appears that the culprit may be an overemphasis on a single goal of design to the detriment of others. For instance, very deep plans helped provide radical flexibility, enabled by then-new technologies such as air- handling systems, interstitial plant, and increasingly efficient electric lighting, but, as it turned out, in many areas of the hospital this provided the wrong sort of flexibility. Hospitals of such diverse design as inflexible towers on the one hand, and low-rise hospitals modelled on the terrifically innovative and expensive Greenwich Hospital4


on the other, are all facing premature obsolescence. Figure 2: Key planning principles: how does MMC fare? 64 Health Estate Journal February 2022


A balancing act Traditionally, the more frequent complaint with regard to modular buildings has been that temporary blocks are retained for decades, with compromises that made sense in the light of urgency potentially becoming a burden. That said, MMC can speed up construction considerably,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68