search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS


US signals support for limits on production in UN plastics treaty


Reports that the US government has changed its position and will support virgin plastics production limits in negotiations for the UN’s Global Plastic Pollution Treaty have been met with a vehement response. “The White House’s misguided


reversal in support of plastic production caps is not only impractical but directly harmful to all US manufacturers and will get us no closer to reaching our shared environmental goals,” said Matt Seaholm, President and CEO of Plastics Industry Association. The association’s statement followed Reuters reporting a major policy shift disclosed by a source close to US negotiators in the treaty, which is set for a final round of talks in Busan,


South Korea, in November. According to Reuters, this puts the US in closer alignment with the so-called High Ambition Coalition of countries that has called for “binding provisions to restrain and reduce the production and consumption of primary plastic polymers to sustainable levels”. Seaholm said: “With this decision,


the White House has turned its back on Americans whose livelihoods depend on our industry, as well as on manufacturers in all sectors that rely on plastic materials.” Supporting the change in policy, John Hocevar, Greenpeace USA Ocean’s Campaign Director, said: “The United States’ decision to back a global reduction in plastic production is a


watershed moment in the fight against plastic pollution. This move puts the US on the right side of history, standing with countries that recognize that we cannot recycle our way out of this crisis. It is a step in the right direction that science and justice demand.” Chris Jahn, President and CEO of


the American Chemistry Council, however called it “a lose-lose situation” which puts US jobs at risk and hampers the US negotiators’ position “since other countries know such drastic positions are unlikely to secure the 67 votes needed in the [US] Senate to join the agreement”. � www.plasticsindustry.orgwww.greenpeace.orgwww.americanchemistry.com


salat@jwell.cn


sales@jwell.cn


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62