search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HEADLINE HITTERS


GOVERNMENT ‘PLAYING A GAME OF MONOPOLY’ SAYS WASTE EXPERTS


A group of six independent waste management companies have come together for the first time in an attempt to stop the proposal of local waste and recycling monopolies, by providing their combined expertise to ensure that DEFRA has a representative and full understanding of the market.


Following the government’s launch of a series of consultations to overhaul the waste system, cut plastic pollution, and move towards a more circular economy, DEFRA’s latest consultation proposed plans to improve recycling both from households and businesses.


Although the group says there is much to applaud, including the consultation on changing packaging labels and plans to align the myriad of council recycling schemes to reduce confusion, the consultation has raised serious concerns among industry specialists.


The group, which comprises of BPR Group, Cawleys, First Mile, Grundon, KP Waste and Simply Waste Solutions has a combined turnover of more than £235m and collects 1.2m tonnes of waste every year from over 55,000 business clients, often achieving recycling rates of over 60%, in contrast to the static 45% rate achieved by local authorities & the national waste companies from households in England.


The skills, best practice and engagement activities to unlock these higher recycling rates have been overlooked from DEFRA’s initial consultation, according to the group,


which has raised concerns that during initial consultations, DEFRA only met a handful of national waste management companies and none of the medium sized regional companies that are the bedrock of the industry.


It says, that as such, DEFRA’s “understanding of the market is skewed and missing key information”, resulting in proposals, such as local monopolies, being put forward as answers to non-existent problems.


They added: “There is real danger here as economic policy in the


last 40 years has recognised the potentially damaging outcomes of such monopolies. A lack of motivation to innovate, a reduction in service quality, higher prices and structural inefficiencies are all associated with a single supplier to a market.”


The six companies have now submitted a joint response to the DEFRA consultation and are keen to contribute their expertise on an ongoing basis and are therefore calling for DEFRA to include representatives of this group in future discussions.


https://twitter.com/ConceptCAFM/


https://www.linkedin.com/company/fsi-fm-solutions-limited?trk=tyah


info@fsifm.com https://www.fsi.co.uk/


06 | TOMORROW’S FM


twitter.com/TomorrowsFM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86