search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Laboratory Products


Surface area of metallic stearate excipients (zinc and calcium stearate) – a case study


Dr Katie Struckhoff, Head of Product Competence for Surface Area and Pore Size Analyzers, and Nathalia Prieto, Product Specialist Anton Paar GmbH, www.anton-par.com


Zinc and calcium stearate (metal soaps) are among the most commonly used stearates across diverse industries. Their surface area, as characterised with the Anton Paar Nova 600 and Kaomi for Nova 21 CFR Part 11 software, for example, confi rms manufacturing quality and specifi cation values in controlled, regulated processes.


Metal soaps, also known as metallic stearates, are typically produced from the reaction between stearic acid and metals or metal oxides. As a result, highly hydrophobic compounds with high melting temperatures are obtained, making them ideal as stabilisers, lubricants, and anti-caking agents, among other applications. [1] Metal soaps are used for a wide variety of purposes – water resistance, stabilisation, thickening, lubrication (and others) – across a range of industries, such as:


• Cosmetics • Food processing • Polymer and rubber manufacturing • Powder metallurgy • Pharmaceutical production


The versatility of metal soaps has created a steadily growing market, the value of which is expected to reach $4.9 billion by 2028 [2]. This growth compels industries – especially highly-regulated ones that must comply with governmental regulations such as those imposed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) – to evaluate (characterise) and manufacture raw materials as quickly, effi ciently, and transparently as possible.


Gas adsorption is a trusted technique for determining the specifi c surface area of stearates. Anton Paar’s Nova Series delivers this and other information – such as homogeneity of the evaluated materials – rapidly, reliably, and reproducibly.


Table 1: Analysis parameters for both stearates Parameter


Adsorbate


Bath temperature Sample cell


p/p0 target points


Number of data points Void volume mode p0 mode


Thermal delay


Equilibrium band % Equilibrium interval Equilibrium timeout


Equilibrium minimum time


0 minutes for others Re-dose tolerance Re-dose maximum


Materials and methods


Two commercially-available lab grade samples (zinc stearate and calcium stearate) were used to perform BET-specifi c surface area analysis. To assess the reproducibility of the data, two aliquots of each of the samples were prepared. The characterisation was done using a Nova 600 (a vacuum volumetric analyser that has two analysis stations for simultaneous runs).


Figure 1: Overlay of calcium stearate isotherms Value Nitrogen 77 K (liquid N2)


9 mm large bulb long cell with fi ller rod 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.125 and 0.15 5


Helium measure From ambient 150 seconds 3 1


0 minutes for all points 3 minutes for p/p0 = 0.05;


50 % 7.00 Torr


To collect more data for reproducibility purposes, the two aliquots (per material) were analysed in three separate experiments with degassing between each.


No details of specifi c surface area appear in the calcium or zinc stearate monographs. Therefore, the guidance in USP monograph 846 on magnesium stearate for specifi c surface area was adopted. Specifi cally, the following:


• Sample preparation (degassing conditions) • Correlation coeffi cient > 0.9975 • Relative pressure measurement range


Two aliquots of each of the stearates were prepared in long cells with large bulbs with enough material to reduce noise and improve reproducibility. According to USP, the sample cells were degassed at 40°C for two hours under N2


fl ow on the Nova


600 degassing stations. After the samples reached ambient temperature and were reweighed, they were analysed simultaneously on the same instrument (previously qualifi ed to guarantee correct pressure transducer readings) using the parameters given in Table 1.


According to the monograph, the relative pressure range used to calculate BET surface area was 0.05-0.15 p/p0.


Kaomi for Nova 21 CFR Part 11 software and fi rmware were used to show the capabilities applicable for multiple industries that require Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) such as electronic signatures and records keeping (audit trail) as well as data integrity [3].


Results and discussion


The six total measurements for calcium stearate are overlaid in Figure 1. The BET specifi c surface area (SSA) calculated for each of the two aliquots analysed in triplicate for calcium stearate are given in Table 2. The results for surface area ranged from 6.262 m2 to 6.289 m2


/g all with correlation coeffi cients > 0.998. In addition, according to the BET


estimation, the C constant and intercept have positive values, confi rming that the data are valid and in line with BET requirements.


The six total measurements for zinc stearate are overlaid in Figure 2. In the case of zinc stearate, the surface area values for all data sets ranged from 5.047 m2 m2


/g to 5.098 /g and all data were within specifi cation with positive values for the C constant and


intercept. Because BET is a linear equation, Y = mX + b, a high correlation coeffi cient (linearity) is desirable. For zinc stearate, the correlation coeffi cient values were all > 0.999.


/g


INTERNATIONAL LABMATE - NOVEMBER 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64