search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
21 Drug Discovery, Pharmaceuticals & Cannabis Testing


A viscometer great for the analysis of drug and biological samples


The viscosity of chemical and biological samples is important to know in several research, clinical, and QA scenarios. Professionals working in life sciences, medicine, and pharmaceuticals will be elated to know there is a viscometer capable of measuring low-viscosity samples, handling very small volumes, exerting minimal shear stress, maintaining sterility and gas atmosphere, and much more!


KEM’s EMS-1000S measures viscosity by quantifying the rotational dynamics of a sample-immersed spherical probe spun using Lorentz forces. The instrument has a wide measurement range of 0.1 to 1,000,000 mPa·s (cP), measuring with high accuracy and repeatability even at super-low viscosities. It provides convenient measurement modes for determining the concentration, temperature and shear rate dependence of viscosity. The instrument’s heating/cooling system quickly and stably controls sample temperature to between 0 and 200°C.


The EMS-1000S-compatible sample tubes (and probes) can be autoclaved to prevent biological contamination, handy for sample reuse. Tubes can be hermetically sealed to maintain a certain gaseous atmosphere such as nitrogen-saturated, anaerobic, etc. Samples down to 90μL in volume can be measured, great for scarce and expensive samples. Contact-free measurement means no clean-up, making it safer and improving operational effi ciency. The EMS-1000S is extremely user- friendly, just insert the tube, close the lid, and press start.


More information online: ilmt.co/PL/RBRK and ilmt.co/PL/oBKb 62229pr@reply-direct.com ADVERTORIAL Ensuring API compatibility for successful formulation development


In the pharmaceutical industry, the successful development of a new drug product hinges on the compatibility between the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and its formulation. Early characterisation of the API is crucial for the avoidance of common formulation challenges and delays later in the development process.


Freeze drying, aka lyophilisation, is a widely used technique for preserving pharmaceutical products. It removes water from a product while maintaining its integrity and stability. Freeze-dried products offer several advantages, including:


• Enhanced stability at room temperature: This reduces or eliminates the need for cold chain storage, simplifying product distribution and logistics. • Rapid reconstitution: Freeze-dried products can be quickly reconstituted with water or another solvent for administration.


• Improved dosage accuracy: The precise dosing of freeze-dried products makes them ideal for applications requiring accurate delivery of potent medications.


Why is API compatibility essential for freeze drying? While freeze drying offers numerous benefi ts, a lack of compatibility between the API and its formulation can lead to signifi cant challenges, including:


• Product instability: Incompatible excipients can cause the API to degrade during storage, rendering the product ineffective. • Cake collapse: During freeze drying, the API and excipients form a concentrated ‘cake’. If the API is incompatible with the formulation, the cake can collapse, compromising product stability and appearance. • Slow or incomplete reconstitution: If the API doesn’t readily dissolve in the chosen solvent, reconstitution will be slow or incomplete, impacting product usability.


Approaches to ensure API compatibility To ensure successful freeze drying and formulation development, pharmaceutical scientists employ various analytical techniques to assess API compatibility. These techniques include:


• Solubility studies: Evaluating the API’s solubility in different solvents and excipient solutions helps identify compatible formulation components. • Critical event analyses: Techniques such as freeze drying microscopy (FDM), using a Lyostat5, can reliably identify collapse temperate (Tc) in amorphous products and eutectic temperatures (Teu) in crystalline solutions to reveal physical changes in the API-excipient mixture during freeze drying, indicating potential incompatibilities.


• Thermal and impedance analysis (Zsinφ): Using a Lyotherm. indicates the sample’s molecular mobility, including events not picked up by traditional thermal methods like DTA or DSC alone. • Stability testing: Long-term stability studies under various storage conditions are essential to ensure the fi nal product remains potent and effective.


By prioritising API characterisation and employing appropriate analytical techniques from the outset, pharmaceutical scientists can ensure compatibility between the API and its formulation. This proactive approach lays the foundation for successful freeze drying process development, leading to the production of high-quality, stable, and effective products.


Key takeaways


• Early characterisation of the API is critical for identifying potential formulation challenges.


• Freeze drying offers several advantages for pharmaceutical products, including stability, rapid reconstitution, and improved dosage accuracy.


• API compatibility is essential to prevent product instability, cake collapse, and slow reconstitution post process.


• Analytical techniques like solubility studies, thermal analysis, FDM analysis, and stability testing are employed to assess API compatibility.


By understanding the potential challenges and employing the right techniques, formulators can ensure successful development of stable and effective products. Contact Biopharma Group’s specialists today.


More information online: ilmt.co/PL/92x0 and ilmt.co/PL/kA73


62300pr@reply-direct.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68