search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Focus on ABB - UK Focus xiii


As natural gas is expected to be the only fossil fuel to show growth in the coming years2


.


, with a predicted 30 percent increase


in production to meet rising energy demand, avoiding its release to the atmosphere is critical3


Detection methods need an upgrade


Pipelines are the most cost-effective way to transport natural gas, particularly as many gas fi elds are in areas remote from the consumers and industries that need gas.


The drawback is that pipelines carry a signifi cant risk of leaks. These can have numerous causes, including excavation that damages the pipes, accumulation of snow and ice on pipes and meters, incorrect pressure in the gas system, equipment failure or corrosion and natural events such as earthquakes and fl oods.


As well as contributing a signifi cant global warming load, methane leaks result in lost revenue amounting to billions of dollars a year, and also pose a serious safety risk.


Clearly, pipeline operators need a rapid and accurate way of detecting leaks, one capable of detecting smaller leaks over extended distances.


Unfortunately, many currently used techniques struggle to achieve this. Handheld analog devices need to be caried by technicians over the suspected leak area, as the system tests the air volume only every few seconds. A slow and cumbersome method, the detection devices also have to be calibrated on site, taking more time, while the data gathered also has to be entered by hand into reporting systems, adding further delays.


Essentially, a gas leak detection method needs to detect leaks at very low levels, provide an accurate estimate of their location and also be able to estimate the volume of the emission event.


Taking methane detection to the next level


The limitations of manual methods means that the pledge to cut methane could be seriously compromised – quite simply, countries and gas infrastructure operators need something much quicker and more capable if they are to make serious inroads into the numbers of methane gas leaks.


Many companies are conducting research into new detection and analytic methods, among them ABB, which has developed its Ability natural gas leak detection solution. This is based on Off- Axis Integrated Cavity Output Spectroscopy (OA-ICOS) technology, the latest development in tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy.


OA-ICOS uses a tunable laser source that produces light at a selected wavelength that interacts with the gas being analyzed. The method involves the laser beams entering a highly refl ective cavity, bouncing around many thousands of times before exiting the cavity and being picked up by a photon detector. This in effect creates an optical path many kilometres long, increasing the sensitivity of the measurements and producing a strong absorption as the light interacts with the gas that is let into the cavity. The tunable aspect comes in when the wavelength of the laser light is changed, allowing the concentration of the gas to be measured with high accuracy.


This method offers a sensitivity that is 1,000 times higher than conventional leak detection methods. A detector based on OA- ICOS can detect levels of gas of the order of parts per billion and can do so every second. This allows it to measure concentrations of gas from long distances, something not possible with other technologies.


Increasing speed and range


The technology dramatically improves the speed and range of methane detection and ABB has developed practical solutions that take advantage of these benefi ts.


One of these solutions is MobileGuard™ a vehicle mounted solution that allows gas to be detected from a moving car. As well as the OA-ICOS analyser, it combines data from an anemometer for wind speed and direction and a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna for pinpointing locations. Combining their data with gas concentration measurements, MobileGuard can locate, map and quantify pipeline gas leaks far from the emission source and while travelling at speeds of up to 55mph.


This allows the system to cover 10 to 25 times more land area per minute than traditional methods.


The technology can also take to the skies with the HoverGuard solution. This overcomes the phenomenon of methane leaking and then mixing with the air, decreasing in concentration. Using a drone, the detector can be carried through the diffused methane, calculating its concentration very quickly.


HoverGuard can gather accurate concentration data over large areas at speed, offering a rapid, low cost and safe solution to identify potential leaks. The solution is also useful for reaching hard to access areas such as bridges and tall buildings, areas with restricted access or which present hazards for people.


The drone can cover 10-15 times more land area per minute than traditional methods, while it can also quickly detect leaks more than 100 meters (328 ft) from their source.


Walking surveys can also make use of the detection method via the MicroGuard solution. Using an OA-ICOS analyser, backpack and tablet ruggedized for outdoor use, a GNSS and a dedicated sample wand, technicians can locate suspected methane leakage sites within a few minutes.


All these solutions offer facilities to store and transfer data. For example, MobileGuard and Hover Guard can transfer data and analyses securely to cloud storage for easy sharing and further analysis. MicroGuard™ software also generates comprehensive digital reports of the survey which can be shared immediately.


There is also a fi xed solution designed to provide constant monitoring of potential gas emissions near high risk, sensitive areas such as schools, hospitals and other public places. Known as EverGuard, the solution consists of ABB’s micro portable multi- gas analyzer (GLA131 Series) installed in a weatherproof NEMA 4X enclosure.


Several optional modules are available depending on the power and communications needs of the site. These can include a solar panel, an uninterruptible power supply, a cellular transmitter, a Wi-Fi router, a GNSS receiver, a weather station, or a multi-inlet sampling manifold. The modules allow EverGuard to meet the most stringent requirements of almost any application requiring continuous monitoring of natural gas leaks.


With rapid and accurate analysis, convenient data sharing and reporting and the ability to cover any site or situation, ABB solutions are transforming the way methane is detected, bringing delivery of methane pledges one step closer.


References


1. Global Methane Pledge - https://www.globalmethanepledge. org/


2. Global gas outlook to 2050 | McKinsey - https://www.mckinsey. com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/global-gas-outlook- to-2050


3. World Energy Demand, Including Oil and Gas, Rising to 2050, EIA Says - https://www.naturalgasintel.com/world-energy- demand-including-oil-and-gas-rising-to-2050-eia-says/


Author Contact Details Gary Egerton • ABB Limited • Address: ABB Limited, Howard Road, Eaton Socon, St Neots, Cambs, PE19 8EU, UK • Tel: +44 8706 006122 • Email: enquiries.mp.uk@gb.abb.com • Web: www.abb.com/measurement


WWW.ENVIROTECH-ONLINE.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128