search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
iv UK Focus - Water / Wastewater


OTT HydroMet Launches Turnkey Flood Warning Stations


OTT HydroMet is excited to introduce new Urban Flood Warning Stations, bundled solutions designed to help mitigate the risks associated with fl ooding in any community. Early fl ood warning systems provide timely data to alert stakeholders and communities of potential fl ood events by quickly informing if a critical threshold has been exceeded. OTT HydroMet designed these turnkey stations to simplify the process of establishing a fl ood warning network with the option to enhance the system with additional parameters.


The station provides you with all the technology needed to establish a real-time fl ood warning network. Notable features of the stations include continuous water level monitoring, advanced datalogging with customized thresholds for alerting, and 2-way cellular communication. The station can be upgraded with an additional sensor for precipitation monitoring, advanced weather measurements, or a high-resolution camera to confi rm sensor readings. As always, if you need a customized project solution beyond these stations OTT HydroMet’s trusted project delivery team is happy to partner with you on station confi gurations for stream gauging, meteorological and road weather systems, solar monitoring and more! Reach out for more information.


More information online: ilmt.co/PL/Qe9D For More Info, email:


email: © Reaction Engines Only 1 in 10 emergency overfl ows monitored for sewage


A rising tide of public concern over England’s lax monitoring of emergency sewage overfl ows is becoming impossible to ignore, as statistics reveal that a meager 10% of these overfl ows are assessed for sewage spills. Advocates argue that this oversight enables water companies to sidestep stringent control measures, resulting in unmonitored pollution.


For More Info, email: email:


For More Info, email: email:


There are a staggering 7,016 emergency overfl ows across England, distinguished from storm overfl ows by their usage restrictions. They are sanctioned only in dire circumstances, such as during electrical power outage, a mechanical malfunction of pumps, a fault in the rising main, or downstream sewer blockages.


Alarmingly, water companies are obligated to track only those emergency overfl ows that seep into shellfi sh waters. As a result, a mere 686 emergency overfl ows—just 10% of the total—have logged data over the past two years.


Analyzing this limited data reveals a worrying trend: 102 emergency overfl ows contaminated shellfi sh waters 635 times in 2021, and 86 were discharged 491 times the following year. These fi gures emerged from a Freedom of Information (FOI) request submitted to the Environment Agency by the Marine Conservation Society (MCS). The request exposed the regular and repeated use of these emergency outlets, contrary to their intended purpose.


Dr. Laura Foster, an MCS representative who initiated the FOI request, remarked: “Emergency overfl ows should serve as a fi nal safety measure. However, the scant data available illustrates that these releases are far from rare, and repeated off ences are commonplace. The absence of preventative steps following the fi rst incident is perplexing.”


Dr. Foster emphasized the urgent responsibility of water companies to manage sewage eff ectively. Failure to institute requisite protocols, she warned, puts both marine ecosystems and human health at considerable risk.


Just last month, The Guardian reported that excessive levels of E.coli—harmful bacteria found in feces—had led to the closure of 11 shellfi sh farms in Cornwall. Shellfi sh waters, alongside bathing waters, still or sluggish water bodies, sustainable fi sheries, public parks, and sports water venues, are highly sensitive environments. The industry has voiced anger over the government’s delay in addressing these pressing issues.


Water companies are expected to show that their emergency overfl ow usage was due to uncontrollable circumstances, not


neglect or improper maintenance. Further, they are bound to make all feasible eff orts to avert similar situations in the future.


Yet, an astounding 60% of the emergency overfl ows have been discharged more than once. This has raised red fl ags about water companies potentially fl outing permit conditions without facing repercussions.


Henry Swithinbank, the Policy and Research Manager for the environmental group Surfers Against Sewage (SAS), voiced concern over what he called “another grim instance of a rigged system.” According to him, the current lax regulations have allowed polluters to avoid signifi cant penalties. He stressed the need for full transparency to prevent water companies from concealing their misdeeds and persisting in treating our waterways as sewage dumps.


Chris Tuckett, Director of Policy and Conservation at the MCS, underscored the pressing need for improved monitoring of all emergency overfl ows to begin tackling this signifi cant pollution source. “Without more data from these overfl ows, we cannot fully comprehend the extent of environmental damage,” Tuckett warned.


Consequently, the MCS is pursuing legal action against the government for the misuse of emergency overfl ows. Water UK, the water industry representative, confi rmed that companies were developing strategies to monitor and reduce emergency overfl ow usage but stopped short of providing specifi cs.


A Water UK spokesperson stated that the industry is investing £56 billion in the most substantial sewer modernization since the Victorian era and emphasized the commitment to rectify the situation. They explained that emergency overfl ows are used as a last resort to relieve pressure on sewage facilities when an unexpected issue arises.


However, the Environment Agency’s response to the situation was more cautious. They noted that water companies are required to track emergency overfl ows linked to designated shellfi sh waters as per government advice. While an average of 1.5 discharges occurred per overfl ow annually in 2022, over 70% of these overfl ows went unused. The agency pledged to continue investigating and taking action against non-compliance.


This controversy has led advocates to demand stricter oversight of emergency overfl ows and to tighten regulations on storm overfl ow sewage discharges. Emma Dearnaley, legal director at the Good Law Project, stated that the


recent data suggests the sewage dumping crisis is even more catastrophic than previously realized. She pledged her organization’s support to the MCS in its legal challenge against the government to enforce stronger, more immediate targets for water companies to clean up their act.


For More Info, email: email:


For More Info, email: email:


TALKING POINT


Watch Philip Dunne MP discuss the Environment Act 2021 and transforming river


pollution monitoring As Chairman of the Environmental Audit Committee since 2020, Philip Dunne MP has been at the forefront of raising public awareness of extensive river pollution. To watch Philip discuss how the new Environment Act proposes to tackle this pollution as well as the innovations in monitoring technology that might be required, go to wwww.envirotech-online.com Other topics include How does the Environmental Audit Committee work? What were the fi ndings of the Committee’s Water Quality and Rivers Reports?


What are the water monitoring requirements in the Environment Act 2021?


60731pr@reply-direct.com


How long will water companies have to make changes to their monitoring operations?


For More Info, email: email:


60142pr@reply-direct.com


IET ANNUAL BUYERS’ GUIDE 2023/24


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128