search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OPTIMISING OF THE COLUMN, TEMPERATURE, AND PRESSURE FOR INCREASED RESOLUTION AND PERFORMANCE FOR THE SEPARATION OF ALKANES AND AROMATICS FOR ASTM D5186 AND D6550 USING SFC


SFC is well established for enantiomeric separations and purifi cations in the pharmaceutical industry as well as for fuel analysis of gasoline and diesel using the ASTM D5186 and D6550 methods. Both ASTM methods use a silica column for the separation, while D6550 secondarily employs a silver column for retention of the olefi ns after the alkanes and aromatics are separated. In addition to these methods, GC is often used for analysis for the alkanes, but this application will show this is also possible using SFC.


The fi rst step in optimising the resolution for the ASTM methods is evaluating the available silica columns. Recent advances in column technology have provided numerous new phases and particles including small particle HILIC columns. These new columns were compared to traditional 5um columns to determine which is the best for this analysis.


The second step in improving the system performance is evaluating the retention behavior by adjusting system parameters on the best columns as determined in the previous step. As with HPLC


the column temperature is controlled in SFC, but this change in temperature alters the density of CO2 compared to a change in viscosity in HPLC producing a different effect on the separation in SFC. One additional and unique parameter in SFC is the back pressure, which is not controlled in HPLC, but can be adjusted in SFC to optimise a separation. The parameters of pressure and temperature were evaluated below to determine their effect on the resolution.


With the optimised column, temperature and pressure determined, the system was evaluated for ASTM 5186 and ASTM 6550 methods. In these methods the individual components within each class (non-aromatics, mono-aromatics, poly-aromatics) are not identifi ed, but simply grouped to determine the percentage of each group. Recent interest in further separation and identifi cation of the components within those compound classes has led to additional research.


Non-aromatic hydrocarbons are very diffi cult to retain as seen in the above-mentioned methods. In order to identify the components in the non-aromatics, a signifi cant increase in retention is required. Unique to SFC is the ability to join columns inline to increase the effective length of the separation column. This will be performed to increase the retention and resolution of the non-aromatics for further identifi cation.


Experimental


Equipment CO2


Delivery Pump: Autosampler:


PU-2080-CO2 XLC-3159AS


Column/FID Splitter Oven: GC-FID Back Pressure Regulator:


Results Column Evaluation


Figure 1 shows the comparison of the 6 silica columns from various manufacturers at 120bar back pressure. The JASCO column is the only one that shows any separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane and clearly shows the most resolution between those peaks and the toluene and naphthalene peaks. Figure 2 shows this same comparison at 200bar and again the separation of hexadecane and cyclohexane is the best and the resolution between those peaks and toluene and naphthalene is the largest.


BP-2080


Conditions CO2


Flow rate: 2.0 – 3.0 mL/min


Column/FID Splitter Temp.: 200ºC FID Temperature: Injection volume:


350ºC 0.5 - 1 µL


Figure 1: Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 120bar.Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene.


Figure 2: Silica Column Comparison. Back Pressure 200bar.Blue line = FID, Pink line = UV at 225nm. Peaks: 1. Hexadecane, 2. Cyclohexane, 3. Toluene, 4. Naphthalene


AUGUST / SEPTEMBER • WWW.PETRO-ONLINE.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68