search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Table 1. Summary of Best Quality Evidence by transmission Pathway


First Author, Year


Morgan DJ et al 20128


Title 1. Transmission from patient to HCW


Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria to HCW gloves and gowns after patient contact increases with environmental contamination.


Morgan DJ et al 20109


Frequent MDR A. baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of HCWs


Prospective cohort study


27 HCW–patient interactions: 256 patient samples, 1,572 environmental sites, 131 pairs of HCW hands from the MICU of Rush University Medical Center


Prospective cohort study


199 patient–HCW interactions in 48 ICUs at University of Maryland Medical Center


To estimate the level of hand or glove contamination with VRE among HCWs when interacting with the patient or environment


To determine the incidence of transmission of MDR A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa from patients to HCWs during routine care


Hayden, M.K. et al 200816


Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with VRE or the colonized patients’ environment


Schweizer M et al 201217


The epidemiology of MRSA on a burn trauma unit


2. Transmission from patient to environment


Munoz-Price LS et al 201311


Thom KA et al 201112


A. baumannii: association between environmental contamination of patient rooms and occupant status


Environmental contamination because of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii surrounding colonized or infected patients.


Yakupogullari Y et al 200618


Is airborne transmission of A. baumannii possible? A prospective molecular epidemiologic study in a tertiary- care hospital


Wilson AP et al 200719


Importance of the environment for patient acquisition of MRSA in the ICU: a baseline study


Prospective cohort study


Randomized sequential sampling of bed areas


Prospective cohort study


186 air samples and 82 clinical specimens from Turgut Ozal Medical Center


2,436 environmental samples around 114 patients; 349 samples from HCWs hands and phones from ICUs from 2 London teaching hospitals


479 environmental samples from 50 unique patient rooms in 4 ICUs at University of Maryland Medical Center


Prospective cohort study


628 ICU rooms at a county teaching hospital


To understand the dynamics of Acinetobacter spread in air


To assess the degree of environmental contamination with MRSA in critical care and the likelihood of subsequent new patient acquisition


To determine how frequently the environment surrounding the patient becomes contaminated


To determine the association between room contamination and the status of the occupants


PCR-typing (DiversLab) PFGE


Phage typing


The Acinetobacter concentration was the highest in bedside sampling areas of infected patients. Air isolates were clonally related to clinical strains.


Of 52 patients colonized with MRSA, 34 (65%) had similar strains found consequently in their environment.


PGFE


48% (24/50) of the rooms were positive for MDR A. baumannii. In 17 of 20 instances (85%) (among patients with MDR A. baumannii history), environmental isolates were genetically similar to the patient isolate.


PFGE


39% of rooms with A. baumannii positive patients were contaminated. 10% of rooms with A. baumannii–negative patients were contaminated as well. 6 of 7 instances (86%), environmental isolates were genetically similar to the patient isolate.


Prospective cohort study


603 patient–HCW interactions in 6 different ICUs at University of Maryland Medical Center


To assess the role of environmental contamination in the transmission of MDROs to HCW clothing


Prospective cohort study


144 patients, 67 HCWs and 50 environmental samples from the burn trauma unit at a midwestern academic medical center


To determine whether HCW, environment, or admitted patients could be reservoirs for MRSA


PFGE


Of 103 HCWs whose hand samples were negative for VRE when they entered the room, 70% contaminated their hands/gloves after interacting with the patient and the environment.


PFGE


39% of patient–HCW interactions resulted in HCW G&G contamination with A. baumannii. 9 (5%) episodes resulted in hand contamination after G&G removal; isolates were identical to the G&G strain. 8% of patient–HCW interactions resulted in HCW G&G contamination with MDR P. aeuroginosa (imipenem resistant).


PFGE


33% of P-HCW interactions led to transmission of MDR A. baumannii to HCW G&G. Carbapenem- resistant P. aeruginosa was transmitted 17% of the time. MRSA and VRE were transmitted 14% of time. Of 22 cases (selected for PFGE), 82% of HCW had a strain related to the patient.


PFGE


The USA100 subtype was shared by 3 patients and 1 HCW. In these cases, at least 1 patient was positive before the HCW was.


Study Design Population Relevant Objective


Related Molecular Analysis


Related Finding


450


Natalia Blanco et al


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122