search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
422


Scott Anjewierden et al


Records identified through database searching (n=2032)


Additional records identified through other sources (n=1)


Records after duplicates removed (n=1373)


Records screened (n=127)


Records excluded (n=72)


Full-text articles assessed for eligibility (n=56)


Full-text articles excluded: 42 • Includes outpatient data: 13 • Combined adult and pediatric data: 13


Studies that met inclusion criteria (n=14)


• Primarily children < 1: 4 • ≤ 10 cases of C. diff: 3 • Appropriate data missing: 4 • CDI recurrence only: 2 • Duplicate data source: 2 • Studied 1 risk factor: 1


Studies included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) (n=9)


Figure 1. Flow chart for study inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis.


Figure 2. Forest plot of the association between antibiotic use and CDI. Vertical line corresponds to no difference point between the 2 groups. Squares correspond to risk ratios. Horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. The diamond indicates the pooled relative risk ratios. Note. df, degrees of freedom; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.


Meta-analyses of risk factors for CDI


Exposure to antibiotics A total of 7 studies reported data on prior antibiotic exposure (5 unadjusted and 2 adjusted studies). Because<3 studies provided adjusted data, we combined studies reporting the adjusted and unadjusted data. Meta-analysis of the 7 studies demonstrated a sig- nificantly increased risk of CDI with prior exposure to any antibi- otic class (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.31–3.52; P=.003) (Fig. 2). There was moderate heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 57%). We also performed subgroup analysis for the adjusted and unadjusted stud- ies. The meta-analysis of the unadjusted studies showed a signifi- cantly increased risk of CDI with prior exposure to any antibiotic class (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.27–4.31; P=.006). There was significant heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 68%). The meta-analysis of the adjusted studies also showed an increased risk of CDI with


prior exposure to antibiotics, but the results were not statistically significant (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.66–3.34; P = .34). There was low heterogeneity between the 2 adjusted studies (I2=1%). Risk factors for CDI with individual antibiotic subclasses were not reported by >2 studies and were therefore not included in the meta-analysis.


Gastric acid suppression We identified 4 studies that reported adjusted data on PPI use as a risk factor for CDI. Meta-analysis of the 4 studies showed increased risk of CDI with PPI use (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07–1.64; P = .01) (Fig. 3). There was moderate heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 36%). Adjusted data for the risk of CDI with H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use was obtained from 3 studies. Meta-analysis of the 3 studies examining H2RA use also showed increased risk of CDI associated with H2RA use, but the result was not statistically


Included


Eligibility


Screening


Identification


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122