search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology


Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of M. saskatchewanense ISMETT strain


Antibiotic Amikacin


Ciprofloxacin Clarithromycin Doxycycline Ethambutol Ethionamide Isoniazid Linezolid


Moxifloxacin Rifabutin Rifampin


Streptomycin Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole


MIC (μg/mL) 8


16 0.5


>16 16


>20 >8 8 2 8 8 8


8/152


manufacturer’s instructions (Table 1).Our results showan antibiotic resistance profile similar to those previouslyobservedinCanadawith their local M. saskatchewanense strains.6 Some differences were also noted; for example, theMICfor rifampicin for all Canadian strains is 0.06 μg/mL, whereas our strain displayed a value of 8 μg/mL for the same antibiotic (Table 1). Althoughwecannot exclude thepossibility that thedifferencesobservedmaybedueto the use of different assays, theymayalso indicate that the ItalianM.saskatchewanensehas either undergonemutations since it leftNorthAmerica or that its origin lies elsewhere. However, no epidemiological data about this NTM are currently available, and we can only speculate about whether it derives from the North American strains or from some other geo- graphical location. To the best of our knowledge, we report for the first time the


detection of a M. saskatchewanense clinical isolate in a European health facility. Our results highlight the fact that screening assays for TB detection in blood can produce misleading results and could lead to incorrect antimicrobial therapy. Careful evaluation for


497


mycobacterial infection must be performed, and the organism must be identified and coupled with highly discriminating techniques such as NGS, as necessary.


Author ORCIDs. Bruno Douradinha, 0000-0002-9980-4505


Acknowledgments. We thank the Molecular Diagnostics at ISMETT team members for technical support and helpful insight. Informed consent of all inhouse patients is required by internal regulations before any experiments can be performed with their clinical samples.


Financial support. This study was supported by internal funding.


Conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.


References


1. Allison TL. Immunosuppressive therapy in transplantation. Nurs Clin N Am 2016;51:107–120.


2. Di Mento G, CuscinoN, Carcione C, Cardinale F, Conaldi PG, Douradinha B. Emergence of a Klebsiella pneumoniae ST392 clone harbouring KPC-3 in an Italian transplantation hospital. J Hosp Infect 2018;98:313–314.


3. Monaco F, Di Mento G, Cuscino N, Conaldi PG, Douradinha B. Infant colonisation with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains co- harbouring blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 carbapenemases genes: a case report. Int J Antimicrob Agent 2018;52:121–122.


4. Aguado JM, Silva JT, Samanta P, Singh N. Tuberculosis and transplantation. Microbiol Spectr 2016;4:607–622.


5. Zhu C, Liu Z, Li Z, Mei S, Hu Z. The performance and limitation of T-SPOT. TB for the diagnosis of TB in a high prevalence setting. J Thorac Dis 2014;6:713–719.


6. Turenne CY, Thibert L, Williams K, et al. Anovel slowly growing scotochro- mogenic species from human clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium interjectum and Accuprobe-positive for Mycobacterium avium complex. Int J Sys Evol Microbiol 2004;54:659–667.


7. Fedrizzi T, Meehan CJ, Grottola A, et al. Genomic characterization of non- tuberculous Mycobacteria. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–14.


8. Springer B, Stockman L, Teschner K, Roberts GD, Bo EC. Two-laboratory collaborative study on identification of Mycobacteria: molecular versus phe- notypic methods. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:296–303.


9. Hermansen TS, Thomsen VØ, Lillebaek T, Ravn P. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria and the performance of interferon gamma release assays in Denmark. PLoS One 2014;9:e93986–e93986.


Oseltamivir for prophylaxis of influenza in vaccinated hemodialysis patients


Jens T. Van Praet MD, PhD1, Sanne Steyaert MD1, Mirjam Demesmaecker1, Veerle Grootaert PharmD2 and


Marijke Reynders MD3 1Department of Nephrology and Infectious diseases, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium, 2Department of Pharmacy, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium and 3Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium


— To the Editor Influenza is a seasonal respiratory orthomyxoviral infection that causes major morbidity and mortality in elderly and


Author for correspondence: Jens Van Praet, Email: Jens.VanPraet@azsintjan.be Cite this article: Van Praet JT, et al. (2019). Oseltamivir for prophylaxis of influenza in


vaccinated hemodialysis patients. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 40: 497–498, https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.11


© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.


patients with chronic conditions such as end-stage renal disease. The virus is transmitted via small-particle aerosols and large droplets.1 These transmission modes are highly relevant in the con- text of a hemodialysis unit because patients stay in the same room for several hours and healthcare workers can facilitate the spread through inadequate hand hygiene. Serological studies indicate an


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122