354
Current challenges in developing effective guidelines for investiga- tional agents include limited knowledge of influencing factors such as the in vivo pathogenic potential of engineered viruses, duration of viral shedding, infectivity, unpredictable control over replication competent viruses with concomitantly administeredimmunomodu- lators, and finally, the potential for regaining replication competence or wild-type reversion of engineeredoncolytic viral
agents.The prin- ciples articulated here are also applicable to other nonvirologic bio- logic antitumor therapies, such as Clostridium novyi and Listeria monocytogenes, with specific attention to individual patient risks and appropriate instiutional review board oversight. For FDA-approved agents, the infection control community must
recognize the emergence of viral immunotherapy in mainstream oncologiccareand itspositiveimpact on patient survival to develop standardized guidelines that can be broadly adopted to overcome implementation challenges across a variety of settings (eg, inpatient vs outpatient or treatment in the context of a clinical trial vs nontrial setting). Protocols established for these agents will guide institutional practices for use of oncolytic viral vectors currently in development. The approach of embedding the role of infection preventionists
within existing research regulatory structure (eg, IBC or IRB) enhances adherence to IC recommendations. Through our rigor- ous process of preapproval agent review, operational planning, and postapproval audit and feedback, we have been able to achieve responsible conduct of research and safe implementation of vari- ous oncolytic viral vector trials. Recent modifications to NIH over- sight of human recombinant gene therapy trials, including the transfer responsibility to institutional biosafety committees, further highlights the importance of infection control oversight of oncolytic viral vector trials.24,25
Financial support. This infection control research was supported by the MSKCC Core Grant (grant no. P30 CA008748).
Conflicts of interest. Dr Glickman is a consultant for Vedanta Biosciences. All other authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
References
1. Kobayashi H. Viral xenogenization of intact tumor cells. Adv Cancer Res 1979;30:279–299.
2. Desjardins A, Gromeier M, Herndon JE 2nd, et al. Recurrent glioblastoma treated with recombinant poliovirus. N Engl J Med 2018;379:150–161.
3. Johnson DB, Puzanov I, Kelley MC. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Immunotherapy 2015;7:611–619.
4. Sheridan C. First oncolytic virus edges towards approval in surprise vote. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:569–570.
5. Puzanov I, MilhemMM, Minor D, et al. Talimogene laherparepvec in com- bination with ipilimumab in previously untreated, unresectable stage IIIB- IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2619–2626.
6. Ribas A,DummerR, Puzanov I, et al. Oncolytic virotherapy promotes intra- tumoral T cell infiltration and improves anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Cell 2017;170:1109–1119.
7. HarringtonKJ,Puzanov I,Hecht JR, et al. Clinical development of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC): a modified herpes simplex virus type-1–derived oncolytic immunotherapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015;15:1389–1403.
Elizabeth V. Robilotti et al
8. Kohlhapp FJ, Kaufman HL. Molecular pathways: mechanism of action for talimogene laherparepvec, a new oncolytic virus immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:1048–1054.
9. Conry RM, Westbrook B, McKee S,Norwood TG. Talimogene laherparepvec: first in class oncolytic
virotherapy.HumVaccin Immunother 2018;14:839–846.
10. Williams BR. PKR: a sentinel kinase for cellular stress. Oncogene 1999; 18:6112–6120.
11. Liu BL, Robinson M, Han ZQ, et al. ICP34.5 deleted herpes simplex virus with enhanced oncolytic, immune stimulating, and antitumour properties. Gene Ther 2003;10:292–303.
12. Summary basis for regulatory action. US Food and Drug Administration website.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Cellular GeneTherapyProducts/ApprovedProducts/UCM473103.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed June 30, 2018.
13. Kaufman HL, Bines SD. OPTIM trial: a phase III trial of an oncolytic herpes virus encoding GM-CSF for unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Future Oncol 2010;6:941–949.
14. Hu JC, Coffin RS, Davis CJ, et al. A phase I study of OncoVEXGM-CSF, a second-generation oncolytic herpes simplex virus expressing granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:6737–6747.
15. MacKie RM, Stewart B, Brown SM. Intralesional injection of herpes simplex virus 1716 in metastatic melanoma. Lancet 2001;357:525–526.
16. Papanastassiou V, Rampling R, Fraser M, et al. The potential for efficacy of the modified (ICP 34.5(-)) herpes simplex virus HSV1716 following intra- tumoural injection into humanmalignant glioma: a proof of principle study. Gene Ther 2002;9:398–406.
17. Gangi A, Zager JS. The safety of talimogene laherparepvec for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2017;16:265–269.
18. Senzer NN, Kaufman HL, Amatruda T, et al. Phase II clinical trial of a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-encoding, second-gen- eration oncolytic herpesvirus in patients with unresectable metastatic mela- noma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5763–5771.
19. Andtbacka RH, Kaufman HL, Collichio F, et al. Talimogene laherparepvec improves durable response rate in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2780–2788.
20. Chesney J, Awasthi S, Curti B, et al. Phase IIIb safety results from an expanded-access protocol of talimogene laherparepvec for patients with unresected, stage IIIB-IVM1c melanoma. Melanoma Res 2018;28:44–51.
21. Federal adverse events reporting
system.US Food and Drug Administration website.
https://fis.fda.gov/sense/app/777e9f4d-0cf8-448e-8068-f564c31baa25/ sheet/45beeb74-30ab-46be-8267-5756582633b4/state/analysis. Accessed May 11, 2018.
22. Wall LM, Baldwin-Medsker A. Safe and effective standards of care: support- ing the administration of T-VEC for patients with advanced melanoma in the outpatient oncology setting. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2017;21:E260–E266.
23. IMLYGIC (talimogene laherparepvec) prescribing information. Amgen website.
https://www.pi.amgen.com/~/media/amgen/repositorysites/pi-amgen- com/imlygic/imlygic_pi.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed November 11, 2018.
24. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Science Policy (OSP) Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Research. Proposed changes to the NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules. NIH website.
https://osp.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/ NIH_Guidelines.html. Published 2018. Accessed December 27, 2018.
25. Collins FS, Gottlieb S. The next phase of human gene-therapy oversight. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1393–1395.
26. Chesney J, Puzanov I, Collichio F, et al. Randomized, open-label phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec in com- bination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced, unresectable melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:1658–1667.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132