search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
310


Iman Fakih et al


Table 2. Posterior Summary of the Incidence Rate Ratios of Hospital Characteristics for Healthcare-Associated Bloodstream Infections and the Most Common Subtypes for the Cohort and Hospitals that Participated in BACTOT for <10 Years


Variable Covariate Bedsc


NT with ICUd Teaching hospitald


Posterior Mean of the Incidence Rate Ratio (95% Posterior Credible Interval) HABSI


CA-BSI


All Hospitalsa 1.01


(1.01–1.02) 1.58


(1.34–1.87) 2.42


(1.95–3.01)


<10 yb 1.02


(1.01–1.03) 1.78


(1.37–2.35) 2.20


(1.49–3.31)


All Hospitalsa 1.01


(1.00–1.02) 2.42


(1.71–3.56) 6.12


(4.01–9.47)


<10 yb 1.02


(1.01–1.03) 1.99


(1.1–3.66) 3.14


(1.54–6.66)


infection secondary to urinary tract infection. aModels fitted to data from the entire cohort. bModels fitted separately to data from hospitals that have participated in BACTOT for <10 years. cThe effect of 10 beds is estimated by transforming a hospital’s number of beds by dividing by 10. dNonteaching hospital with ICU incident. Rate ratio is relative to nonteaching hospitals without ICUs.


All Hospitalsa 1.03


(1.02–1.04) 0.89


(0.67–1.18) 1.23


(0.86–1.75) NCA-BSI


<10 yb 1.03


(1.02–1.05) 1.02


(0.63–1.69) 1.42


(0.69–2.98) BSI-UTI


All Hospitalsa 1.01


(1.00–1.01) 1.90


(1.54–2.35) 1.72


(1.32–2.23)


<10 yb 1.00


(0.99–1.01) 2.14


(1.49–3.11) 1.75


(1.07–2.87) Note. HABSI, healthcare-associated bloodstream infection; CS-BSI, catheter-associated bloodstream infection; NCA-BSI, non–catheter-associated bloodstream infection; BSI-UTI, bloodstream


Table 3. Posterior Summary of the Incidence Rate Ratios of Year of Entry, Relative to 2014–2015, for Healthcare-Associated Bloodstream Infections and the Most Common Subtypes from Models Fitted for the Cohort and for Hospitals that Participated for <10 Years


Variable Infection Hospitals 2013–2014


2012–2013 2011–2012 2009–2010 2008–2009 2007–2008


Posterior Mean of the Incidence Rate Ratio (95% Posterior Credible Interval)


HABSI


All Hospitalsa 0.81


(0.60–1.03) 0.92


(0.69–1.19) 0.84


(0.60–1.08) 0.79


(0.58–1.01) 0.72


(0.53–0.94) 0.98


(0.79–1.18)


<10 yb 0.78


(0.58–0.99) 0.97


(0.74–1.28) 0.78


(0.56–1.01) 0.74


(0.54–0.96) 0.69


(0.51–0.92) CA-BSI


All Hospitalsa 0.68


(0.35–1.04) 0.78


(0.45–1.17) 0.78


(0.42–1.14) 0.84


(0.51–1.20) 0.82


(0.49–1.17) 1.17


(0.83–1.61)


infection secondary to urinary tract infection. aModels fitted to data from the entire cohort. bModels fitted separately to data from hospitals that have participated in BACTOT for <10 years.


<10 yb 0.79


(0.43–1.04) 0.89


(0.57–1.14) 0.83


(0.46–1.07) 0.89


(0.58–1.13) 0.86


(0.53–1.08) NCA-BSI


All Hospitalsa 0.99


(0.74–1.32) 1.18


(0.91–2.02) 0.97


(0.68–1.29) 0.95


(0.66–1.24) 0.86


(0.57–1.12) 0.96


(0.75–1.21)


<10 yb 0.99


(0.73–1.36) 1.20


(0.90–2.29) 0.96


(0.65–1.30) 0.96


(0.66–1.28) 0.87


(0.56–1.12) BSI-UTI


All Hospitalsa 0.82


(0.59–1.07) 1.11


(0.85–1.54) 0.88


(0.63–1.17) 0.78


(0.56–1.03) 0.65


(0.45–0.92) 0.93


(0.73–1.14) Note. HABSI, healthcare-associated bloodstream infection; CS-BSI, catheter-associated bloodstream infection; NCA-BSI, non–catheter-associated bloodstream infection; BSI-UTI, bloodstream


<10 yb 0.76


(0.56–1.01) 1.31


(0.93–1.88) 0.88


(0.64–1.19) 0.70


(0.51–0.95) 0.61


(0.45–0.83)


posterior rates of years 2 to 10 compared to year 1 (Table 4). This remained the case when only hospitals that participated in BACTOT for <10 years were analyzed separately. As for NCA- BSI, the posterior means of the rate ratios increased from the sev- enth year of surveillance until the tenth, when the rate was 29% (95% CI, 1%–89%) higher than the first year rate. However, in the subgroup analysis, both the posterior means and the credible intervals remained relatively constant. The variance of the pos- teriormean rates for all the models was consistently very low, high- lighting that the year-to-year changes in rates were largely similar across hospitals.


Period effect


We detected little difference in estimated posterior rates across periods within a surveillance year (Supplementary Figure 2 online). The fifth and sixth periods, which overlap with the months of


August and September, were associated with higher HABSI rates than the first periods in April; these were 8% (95% CI, 1%–16%) and 7% (95% CI, 0–14%) higher, respectively. CA-BSI rates also tended to be 15% (95% CI, 1%–33%) higher in the sixth periods compared to the first periods. No difference in NCABSI or BSI-UTI rates across periods was detected.


Discussion


Our study provides novel information regarding HABSI rates over years of surveillance, taking into account period and hospital effects. Contrary to our hypothesis, and despite the dedicated long-term surveillance, we detected no sustained change in rates of HABSI or of its most common subtypes. This remained the case when the 40 hospitals that entered the program at its inception were removed from the analyses. Cohort NCA-BSI rates increased in the seventh year to reach rates only slightly higher than the


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132