search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (2019), 40,320–327 doi:10.1017/ice.2019.2


Original Article


Health and economic burden of antimicrobial-resistant infections in Australian hospitals: a population-based model Teresa M. Wozniak PhD1,2


, Emily J. Bailey MBA2 and Nicholas Graves PhD2


1Menzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital, Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, Darwin, Northern Territory, 0810, Australia and 2Centre for Research Excellence, Reducing Healthcare-Associated Infections, Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia


Abstract Objective: To estimate the additional health and economic burden of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections in Australian hospitals.


Methods: A simulation model based on existing evidence was developed to assess the additional mortality and costs of healthcare-associated AMR Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, and Staphylococcus aureus infections.


Setting: Australian public hospitals.


Findings: Australian hospitals spent an additional AUD$5.8 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI], $2.2–$11.2 million) per year treating ceftriaxone-resistant E.coli bloodstream infections (BSI), and an estimated AUD$5.5 million per year (95% UI, $339,633–$22.7 million) treat- ingMRSApatients. There are no reliable estimates of excess morbidity and mortality fromAMRinfections in sites other than the blood and in particular for highly prevalent AMR E. coli causing urinary tract infections (UTIs).


Conclusion: The limited evidence-base of the health impact of resistant infection in UTIs limits economic studies estimating the overall burden of AMR. Such data are increasingly important and are urgently needed to support local clinical practice as well as national and global efforts to curb the spread of AMR.


(Received 14 September 2018; accepted 21 December 2018)


World leaders gathered at theUnitedNationsGeneralAssembly and called for country-level strategies and implementations plans to reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR)worldwide.1Many countries, including Australia have a nationalAMR strategy and implementa- tion plan already in place,2 but the evidence showing the health and economic burden of these infections on the population is limited.3 The current evidence of the cost of AMR infections to human


health is highly variable.4 Healthcare costs can be quantified several ways with a range of economic perspectives used. One method is to measure the prolongation of length of hospital stay (LoS) and extra mortality risk associated with AMR infections.5,6 Many studies have reported the costs of AMR infections in the past decade,7 and these have produced highly variable estimates ranging from US$10.7–15 million across all AMR organisms8 to £3–11 billion for MRSA only9 or a global economic output of US$100 trillion by 2050.10 The methods used to generate these estimates vary and should be carefully considered prior to new policy being implemented to reduce the problem.11 We aimed to provide Australian estimates of the cost of five


clinically important hospital-associated infections using local data and transparent methods. Estimating the economic burden is


Author for correspondence: Teresa M. Wozniak, Email: teresa.wozniak@menzies.


edu.au Cite this article: Wozniak TM, et al. (2019). Health and economic burden of


antimicrobial-resistant infections in Australian hospitals: a population-based model. Infection Control&Hospital Epidemiology, 40: 320–327, https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.2


© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.


useful to prioritize infection control programs and health policies and to support Australian and global AMR efforts.


Methods Ethics


The Health and Economic Modelling of Antimicrobial Resistance in Australia (HEMAA) project meets the conditions within section 5.1.22 of the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) for exemption from Human Research Ethics Committee review and approval, and an exemption was granted accordingly by the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) University Human Research Ethics Committee. Written approval was provided for the release of data from Queensland Department of Health, Pathology Queensland, pertaining to the organism, site of infection and antibiotic susceptibility testing.


Building the economic model


The economic model was developed with input parameters for each combination of bacteria and resistance profiles (Fig. 1 andTables 1–5). Weestimatedthenumber of resistantandsusceptible infectionsfrom Queensland Department of Health, Pathology Queensland database for the year 2014. A synthesis of published literature informed the estimates of excess LoS, value of a bed day, antibiotic treatment, and excess risk of death. The cost of a single infection was a product of excess cost for antibiotic treatment plus excess length of hospital


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132