search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology


343


Fig. 1. (Continued)


most are from a high-TB-burden country). Existing HCWs were categorized according to the risk of exposure to TB based on their area of work (high- versus low-risk areas; which were mutually exclusive, assuming that HCWs do not work in >1 area concomi- tantly). High-risk areas were classified as emergency medicine, radiology, respiratory, general medicine, hematology-oncology, microbiology or pathology laboratories, medical intensive care or transplant units, based on the likelihood of encountering unrec- ognized pulmonary TB, performing aerosol-generating proce- dures, or encountering infectious specimens.13–15 Further assumptions included the following: (1) all HCWs had


normal chest x-rays at each screening time point; (2) HCWs diag- nosed withLTBI would be adherent to 6months of isoniazid (INH) treatment; (3) no deaths and no transmission or recurrent TB; and (4) a stable level of occupational risk during the time horizon of 3 years.


Screening strategies


Based on discussion with hospital stakeholders regarding consid- erations of feasibility and acceptability, we considered the follow- ing screening strategies for new and current employees with levels of risk stratification (Table 1).


(1) “No screening” (current approach): No HCWs undergo screening for LTBI.


(2) “New”: All newly hired HCWs undergo a triennial screening at the time of employment.


(3) “New international þ triennial high-risk”: Newly hired international staff undergo mandatory LTBI screening, while


existing staff working in high-risk areas are screened once every 3 years. Partial adherence to screening among existing staff is assumed.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132