search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology


Table 3. Mean Overall Total 1-Year Costs Including Interquartile Range (IQR) for Infected and Noninfected Cohorts Overall and by Subgroup Overall Costsa


Infection Related Costsb Variable All Patients Age <65 y Age ≥65 y


Joint replacement Hip


Knee


Elixhauser comorbidities 0


1 or 2 ≥ 3 Staphylococcus aureus Other pathogens


aMann-Whitney U P values <.001. bMann-Whitney U P values <.001.


economic burden from SSI following hip arthroplasty.21 While these studies using a matched design were much smaller than our study, they also noted significant differences in cost and length of stay for infected and noninfected patients.20,21 Using the average 1-year total healthcare costs, in Alberta we


infected joints,15 which is consistent with our observation that patients with S .aureus SSI had higher mean 1-year costs compared to all other pathogens, $108,175 versus $87,317 (P = .077) (US$ 77,340 vs US$ 62,427), though it did not reach sig- nificance. When only the infection finding codes were used, patients with S. aureus SSIs did have significantly higher mean 1-year costs compared to all other pathogens: $83,638 versus $62,228 (P = .006) (US$ 59,797 vs US$ 44,490). Because


spend ~$8.3 million annually on patients who develop complex SSI following primary hip and knee arthroplasties compared to the $1.67 million we would spend had those patients not developed a complex SSI. If the mean annual costs and infection rate (1.04%) is extrapolated to all of Canada, where there are ~100,000 arthro- plasties annually,1 $133.5 million would be spent on patients annually who acquire a complex SSI versus $28 million for the same number of patients with no infection. If we apply the same complex infection rate of 1.04% and costs to the United States, where there are 700,000 hip and knee arthroplasties annually,3 the annual expenditure would be ~$694 million (US$ 496 million) to manage the SSIs, compared to $145 million (US$ 104 million) that would be spent had no infection developed. Staphylococcus aureus can be very difficult to eradicate from


S. aureus is the most commonly isolated causative organism for complex SSI following hip and knee arthroplasty, targeting preventative efforts toward reducing this organism may be worthwhile because colonization with S. aureus is a risk factor for SSI.22 Decolonization protocols studied previously in joint arthroplasty do demonstrate a reduction in SSIs,23 and given the high cost of S. aureus SSI, the use of decolonization protocols may be cost-effective. Our study has several strengths. We performed a population-


based study in a province of >4 million people, identifying all primary hip and knee replacements and all subsequent complex SSIs that occurred within 3 months of arthroplasty. We used high- quality microcosting data, which is not commonly done, and our estimates are likely generalizable to the rest of Canada. While costs are not always directly comparable between countries, these find- ings can still be used as a guide. Our study does have limitations. We have likely underestimated the cost differences across infected and noninfected patients because we did not include elements such as physician claims. Additionally, we did not consider costs borne by the patients themselves. For patients who are employed, there are costs associated with lost productivity, and for all patients with infections, there are additional patient-borne costs for outpatient antibiotics, rehabilitation, and costs related to travel for medical care. Finally, superficial SSIs were absorbed into the noninfected cohort, so itis possible that costdifferences would have been even greater between the infected and noninfected cohorts had super- ficial infections been considered separately.


Infected Cohort, $ (IQR) 95,321


(49,623–120,636) 90,717


(42,827–122,029) 98,797


(55,351–120,447) 98,047


(51,938–124,428) 91,822


(46,204–110,921) 78,721


(40,752–100,151) 93,103


(49,507–121,518) 116,002


(61,980–141,308) 108–175


(50,794–150,830) 87, 317


(49,570–109,139)


Non-Infected Cohort, $ (IQR) 19,893


(12,610–19,723) 17,787


(12,467–17,877) 21,630


(12,762–21,579) 20,584


(13,042–19,906) 19,444


(12,287–19,622) 17,903


(12,392–17,910) 20,967


(12,743–20,564) 22,808


(13,116–23,148) …





Infected Cohort, $ (IQR) 70,144


(35,923–86,368) 68,356


(35,487–85,586) 72,020


(36,148–88,389) 72,060


(41,582–89,042) 68,369


(31,868–82,968) 58,510


(31,868–76,321) 68,401


(35,560–81,718) 85,839


(49,000–89,656) 83, 638


(41,492–103,670) 62, 228


(34,780–78,210)


Noninfected Cohort, $ (IQR) 13,195


(10,269–13,049) 12,534


(10,269–12,575) 13,740


(10,269–13,616) 14,132


(11,434–13,783) 12,586


(10,190–12,432) 12,287


(10,269–12,381) 13,490


(10,269–13,420) 14,836


(10,597–14,845) …





1187


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144