search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology


Table 5. Recommended physician-, pharmacist- and microbiology-driven AMS program interventions. Intervention


Strength of recommendation


Physician-driven


Implementation of local guidelines for surgical prophylaxis and empiric antibiotic therapy of common infection syndromes


Use of monotherapy instead of combination antibiotics as a standard approach to most infection treatments


Use of antibiotic diversity (e.g. multiple agents and classes)


Formulary restriction and preauthorization and/or prospective audit and feedback


Education


Pharmacist-driven De-escalation


Dose optimization (using PK/PD models and therapeutic drug monitoring)


IV to oral switching Microbiology-driven


Use of rapid diagnostic testing in addition to conventional diagnostic testing


Selective antibiotic susceptibility reporting


Site-specific hospital antibiograms with or without active surveillance


Strong Strong


Strong Strong


Weak Low High Low Moderate Low


China,65,73 Hong Kong,75 Indonesia,22 Singapore38,39


China76 Japan77,78


China,79 Hong Kong,80 Malaysia,10 Singapore,39,54,48,62 Korea,64 Thailand33,55


China,81 Japan,82 Korea,56 Taiwan,83 Thailand,55 Singapore54,57


Strong Strong


Strong Strong


Strong Strong


AMS, antimicrobial stewardship; IV, intravenous; NA, not available; PK/PD, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic


specific drugs increases when consumption of those drugs passes a critical threshold.50,51 Therefore, strategies promoting antibiotic diversity should be encouraged, such as changing the first-line antibiotic in consecutive patients or prescribing according to patient characteristics.52,53 In line with IDSA/SHEA guidelines,8 we do not recommend antibiotic cycling as an AMS strategy.


Formulary restriction and preauthorization and/or prospective audit and feedback (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). All AMS programs should include some form of pro- spective audit and/or formulary restriction. With restriction and preauthorization, approval of restricted agents must be granted by an ID expert or another authorized clinician (eg, if ID specialists are unavailable) before they can be prescribed. With prospective audit and feedback, which has similar effects to formulary restriction and preauthorization, the prescription is reviewed by appropriate staff members after empiric antibiotic therapy has been initiated, and recommendations are made based on factors such as hospital guidelines, potential for misuse (spectrum of antibiotic activity), hospital AMR patterns, and the availability of microbiologic test results. Many physicians in Asian countries practice social bedside medicine and like to be personally involved in patient care, so prospective audit and feedback is better suited to such prescribing culture than preauthorization.27,54,55 Formulary restriction and preauthorization can be conducted


on a small scale by evaluating antimicrobial usage patterns and resistance trends, then devising interventions targeted at a single


antibiotic agent or class thought to be misused. For example, an intervention focused on carbapenems in response to endemic carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii may be more practical than wide-ranging formulary restriction in many Asian hospitals.


Education (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). Passive educational activities, such as quarterly or yearly lectures, should not be solely relied upon to improve antibiotic prescribing, but they should be used to complement other AMS activities. Presenting the positive impact of the hospital AMS program can encourage participation by all providers. An education program in combination with ongoing feedback as part of the audit/feed- back process is an example of an inexpensive and highly effective AMS program that could be easily applied to many hospitals and is well suited to the Asian bedside prescribing culture.54–57


Recommended pharmacist-driven interventions


De-escalation (strong recommendation, low-quality evidence). With this approach, once the pathogen and its susceptibility are known, empiric prescribing should be changed to a narrow- spectrum, pathogen-directed treatment as soon as possible. Carbapenem de-escalation is an example of a beneficial strategy in settings of endemic gram-negative resistance and high rates of carbapenem prescription often found in Asian hospitals.58 Choice of antibiotics for de-escalation during empirical therapy should be based on hospital guidelines, while that for pathogen-


Low Low to moderate Moderate Moderate


Low Low


Thailand,84 Singapore58 Singapore54,58


Korea,85 Singapore38 Australia86 NA Singapore38,57


1241


Overall evidence quality8,17,18


Relevant studies from the Asia-Pacific region


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144