Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
1275
Fig. 1. Survival analysis graphics for hospital readmission and return to work or usual activities after discharge among subjects with and without healthcare-associated infections. (A) Survival graphic for hospital readmission (time counted in days). (B) Survival graphic for return to work or usual activities, with time counted in weeks. Note. HCAI, healthcare-associated infection.
discharge. Most studies have focused on the increased risk of readmissions to hospitals.3–6 However, HCAIs may impact patient autonomy and the utilization of healthcare resources.7 We conducted a cohort study aimed at identifying the impact
of HCAIs among persons discharged after diagnosis of HCAI in a teaching in inner Brazil. Adult patients discharged from Botucatu Medical School Hospital (450 beds) during 2016–2017 after diagnosis of 1 or more HCAIs were enrolled. For each subject, we included 2 controls matched by specialty (for medical patients) or by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surgical group.8 The cohort was followed with weekly telephone calls for 24 weeks. Data recorded included (1) hospital readmissions; (2) return to work or usual daily activities (for those who did not work); (3) number of medicines taken after discharge; (4) number of medical consultations during follow up; (5) necessity of a caregiver (including family members). Predictors of readmission and return to work or usual activ-
ities were assessed in univariate and multivariable Cox regression models. In addition to HCAIs, demographics, comorbidities (including the Charlson comorbidity index9), and admission data (length-of-stay, procedures, devices) were tested as predictors in those models. We used a stepwise backward strategy for selection of variables in multivariable models. P values of .05 and .10 were set as limits for inclusion and exclusion of variables. Other out- comes were assessed using Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests, when appropriate. We included 55 patients with HCAIs and 110 patients without
HCAIs in the cohort. Among HCAI subjects, 20 had ≥2 infection sites. The overall distribution of sites was as follows: surgical site infection (SSI, n = 29); bloodstream infection (BSI, n = 20); pneumonia, (n = 11); urinary tract infection (UTI, n = 9); skin and soft-tissue infection (SST, n = 6). Readmission during follow-up was reported for 39.3% of
HCAI subjects and 18.2% of others (P=.003). In our multi- variable analysis, HCAI (hazard ratio [HR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20–10.63; P<.001) and the Charlson comorbidity index (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13–2.25; P=.007) were significant predictors of readmission. On the other hand, HCAI was asso- ciated with later return to work or usual activities (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.19–0.57; P < .001). Other significant associations for that
outcome were surgery (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.16–2.90; P = .01) and mechanical ventilation (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33–0.85; P = .009). Figure 1 presents survival graphics for the impact of HCAI on readmission and return to work or usual activities. Tables with detailed results of univariate and multivariable analyzes are available as supplementary files. The groups also differed in the following categories:
∙ Number of medicines taken after discharge: For HCAI, the median was 5 (quartiles [Q] 4 and 8), and for non-HCAI, the median was 4 (Q 2 and 6) (P = .02).
∙ Number of medical consultations during follow-up: For HCAI, the median was 6 (Q 2 and 10), and for non-HCAI, the median was 3 (Q 2 and 5) (P < .001).
∙ Number of consultations with nonmedical healthcare professionals during follow-up: For HCAI, the median was 1 (Q 0 and 2), and for non-HCAI, the median was 0 (Q 0 and 1) (P = 003).
Finally, 20.0% of subjects in the HCAI group required that a
et al3 identified HCAIs as a direct cause of hospital readmissions, while Emerson et al4 (studying a very large retrospective cohort) found that subjects with infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and Clostridium difficile were more likely to be read- mitted. Schor et al5 reported that patients discharged after treating healthcare-associated pneumonia were 7.5 times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days of discharge than those treated for community-acquired pneumonia. Finally, Gohil et al6 identified higher rates of infection-related readmissions among hospitals caring for populations with higher comorbidity and poverty rates. However, our focus went beyond readmissions. We used
family member quit work (either definitively of temporarily) to be a caregiver, a situation reported by only 1 subject (0.9%) in the non-HCAI group (P < .001). Our results agree with those of previous studies. Sreeramoju
return to work or usual activities as a proxy for patient autonomy and found that HCAIs had a significantly negative impact on that outcome. Other findings (eg, greater use of medicines and the number of medical and nonmedical consultations) were
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144
