search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
1160


Table 4. Antibiotic Consumption and Expenditure Variable


DDD per prescription, mean ±SD ∙ Targeted antibiotics ∙ Overall antibiotics


Cost, mean ±SD, US$ ∙ Targeted antibiotics ∙ Overall antibiotics


Length of hospital stay, mean± SD, d


Pinyo Rattanaumpawan et al


Pharmacist (n=303)


13.49 ± 15.31 46.03 ± 52.04


268.88 ± 318.60 434.81 ± 836.46 19.81 ± 24.27


Note. CI, confidence interval; DDD, defined daily dose; SD, standard deviation.


Table 5. Details of 610 Prescriptions of Targeted Antibiotics Variable


Purpose of antibiotic prescription ∙ Treatment ∙ Prophylaxis


First targeted antibiotic prescribed ∙ Piperacillin/tazobactam ∙ Imipenem/cilastatin ∙ Meropenem


Initial recommendation ∙ Approved


∙ Temporarily approved ∙ Not approved


∙ Antibiotic stopped before evaluation


Final recommendation ∙ Approved


∙ Not approved ∙ Antibiotic stopped before evaluation


Percent agreement with ID physician ∙ Initial recommendationa ∙ Final recommendation


aExcluding all prescriptions discontinued before evaluation. Note. ID, infections diseases.


prescribed targeted antibiotics (pharmacist PPRA group versus fellow PPRA group) were meropenem (52.8% vs 56.4%), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (40.9% vs 37.5%), and imipenem/ cilastatin (6.3% vs 6.2%). During the first 72 hours of prescriptions, 133 of 303 pre-


scriptions (43.9%) in the pharmacist PPRA group and 112 of 307 prescriptions (45.7%) in the fellow PPRA group were discontinued before evaluation (P=.06). More than half of prescriptions in both groups were approved or temporarily approved. Only 17 of 303 prescriptions (5.6%) in the pharmacist PPRA group and 27 of 307


prescriptions (8.8%) in the fellow PPRA group were immediately disapproved (P=.11). The distribution of the final recommenda- tion was also similar in the 2 groups. Of prescriptions of the tar- geted antibiotics 63 of 303 prescriptions (20.8%) in the pharmacist PPRA group were finally disapproved versus 66 of 307 prescrip- tions (21.2%) in the fellow PPRA group (P = 0.17). Prescriptions that were disapproved mostly led to changes in


or discontinuation of antibiotics. Among the patients whose prescriptions for targeted antibiotics were disapproved, 19 of 29 prescriptions (65.5%) in the pharmacist PPRA group were later


Fellow (n=307)


12.86 ± 12.14 41.43 ± 62.00


276.51 ± 336.51 393.43 ± 500.75 20.40 ± 18.57


P Value


.58 .32


.77 .46 .74


Pharmacist vs Fellow, Difference (95% CI)


0.62 (–1.57 to 2.82) 4.60 (–4.5 to 13.71)


–7.64 (–59.76 to 44.48) 41.38 (–68.08 to 150.84) 0.59 (–4.02 to 18.39)


Pharmacist (n=303), No. (%)


287 (94.7) 16 (5.3)


124 (40.9) 19 (6.3)


160 (52.8)


61 (20.1) 92 (30.4) 17 (5.6)


133 (43.9)


105 (36.7) 63 (20.8) 135 (44.5)


144/170 (84.7) 168/168 (100.0)


Fellow (n=307), No. (%)


285 (92.8) 22 (7.2)


115 (37.5) 19 (6.2)


173 (56.4)


78 (25.4) 90 (29.3) 27 (8.8)


112 (36.5)


126 (41.0) 66 (21.5) 115 (37.5)


178/195 (91.3) 190/192 (99.0)


.17 .11


P Value .34


.59


.05 .19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144