February 26, 2020 - Lethbridge Sun Times/Shopper - page 30 SUN TIMES/SHOPPER

New school funding model T

Tim Kalinowski Lethbridge Herald

he Alberta government unveiled a new funding model for the province’s schools on Tuesday, but local school boards remain in the

Thank you to everyone who voted for Flair Travel Planners in the “2020 Lethbridge Best of the Best”.

As part of the Lethbridge business community we strive to give the quality of service that we ourselves would like to receive.

We are proud to provide personal attention and give recommendations based on our professional travel experience. Our motto at Flair Travel is “We’ve Been There”. We’ll be there for your entire journey, from departure to return. At Flair Travel Planners we will make your travel dreams come true!

Pat, Brian, Karen, Gosia & Cristiana

extend a heartfelt “Thank You, Lethbridge” Flair Travel Planners

722 - 4 Ave. S., Lethbridge • Ph: 403-329-1030 www.fl

Was your



ALL Nominations for 2021 Best of the Best will open December 1st, 2020

To preview, nominate or suggest an edit, visit from December 1st - 20th for more information.

dark as to what this funding model will mean to urban school divisions particularly. Minister of Education Adriana LaGrange

announced the government would no longer be funding school boards on a per student, annual basis, but rather on a three- year weighted average of the student population of each particular school division instead. According to an example provided by the

government, a hypothetical school board with 6,058 students in year one when the three-year average is measured is maybe projected to decline to 5,791 students by year three. Under the new formula, that school board would still receive funding for 5,889 students over and above the 5,791 projected based on their three-year average. So that school board would benefit with funding for 92 students more than their actual enrolment projections. In a growing school division like the

Lethbridge School Division the new formula may have the opposite effect. Again according to the example provided

by the province Tuesday, a hypothetical school division with 16,438 students in year one could be projected to grow to 16,734 students by the third year. Due to the new formula’s weighted average, that growing school division would only receive enough funding for 16,601 students; so 133 less funding than their projected need. When challenged on this point, LaGrange

stated she felt the funding model was “equitable,” but provided no numbers to back this up. She said the numbers would be out on Feb. 28 after the Alberta spring budget passes. She also said by consolidating the current available grants from 36 to 15 school boards would gain

more money in the 2020-21 school year. Again, LaGrange did not release any

budget details as to how this would be accomplished as Education funding in the province will remain flat in 2020-21 at $8.223 billion. She suggested it would be accomplished because the new funding model would reduce red tape and reduce administrative costs. “The bottom line to school divisions:

every single school division will actually receive more funding in the 2020-2021 school year because of the efficiencies, the containment of red tape and administrative (savings),” she said. When asked if the new funding model

and grant consolidations would make up for the $5 million cut from the Lethbridge School Division’s budget taken by the province out of its Class Size Grant this year, LaGrange stated there had been no cuts to Education as the budget had remained flat at $8.223 billion in 2019-20 and will remain flat at the same rate in 2020-21. LaGrange’s statement does not reflect his

school division’s experience, said Lethbridge School Division board chair Clark Bosch, when asked if he felt like his division had experienced a cut. “Most certainly, I feel like we have had a

cut,” Bosch emphasized, contradicting the minister’s statement. “In the fall we used some reserves, and we didn’t make any changes to the way we deliver our (services) this year. We took it out of reserves. We had $5.1 million less than we had the year before. We ended up with about $3.1 million we had to find to balance in mid- year. “When you look at the huge picture

overall in the whole province, and the funding is the same,” he stated, “that doesn’t mean everybody’s funding is the same.” Flat budgets also do not account for

inflation or enrolment growth, he explained, essentially amounting to a backdoor cut on their own.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64